________________
10 Vide IV K.A.S. III. 3 off. See Chap. IV Infra. 11 cf. Bhāmaha VI. 24 : alat qysia etc. 12 VKASV. 1.3-5-6, 7-11 etc. Vāmana gives greater details,
Vide Dr. S. K. De, HSP-II, p. 43. 13 Rājasekhara describes śāstra as growing like a big river
(K.M. II). 14 Dr. S. K. De denies Kaviśikṣā a place under general
Poetics. HSP-11 (Chapter-X), p. 287. 15 Dr. V. M. Kulkarni, "Sanskrit Writers on Plagiansm" in
"Studies in Sanskrit Sāhityaśāstra", pp. 2-3. (p. 54) Also See F. W. Thomas' paper on 'The Making of a Sanskrit Poet' in Sir R. G. Bhandarkara Comm. Vol.. BORI, 1917.
16 Anandavardhana deals with Samväda or coincidences in
poems by different great authors (Dhv. Al. IV. 11). He warns that all such coincidences should not be regarded as identical (involving plagiarism).
17 Quoted by Dr. P. V. Kane from the Alamkārasekhara,
p. 20 (Nir. Ed.).
18 Vide Prof. S. P. Bhattacharya on "Three Lost Master
pieces of Alaskāraśāstra" in "Studies in Indian Poetics", pp. 29, 32 etc. He laments the loss of Udbhata's Bhāmahavivarana and underlines the position of the three lost works as feeder-streams to later writers (p. 29).
Dr. K. Krishnamoorthy ("Studies in Indian Aesthetics and Criticism', p. 33) discusses the recovery of Udbhata's work in his article "Fragments from Udbhata's
Bhāmahavivarana". 19 Dhv. Al. 11. 19 ff. Infusing poetry with suggestion, its
soul, and following faithfully the specified ways in which
485
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
