Book Title: Kavyanushasana Critical Study
Author(s): A N Upadhye
Publisher: A N Upadhye

Previous | Next

Page 485
________________ Guna and Alamkara into an effective relationship with Rasadhvani and follows it up with elaborate accounts of Dhvani (1.19 etc.) and Rasa (II) as well as of Dosa (III), Guņa (IV) and Alaṁkāra (V-VI). For this reason, Viśvanatha's criticism of Mammata's definition of Kavya loses much sharpness in regard to Hemachandra's definition. However, from a technical point of view, the charges of such a definition being negative, too narrow or inconsistent and incomplete apply, more or less equally, to Hemachandra's Kavyalakṣaṇa. But, in practical terms, we can say with Dr. P. V. Kane that this definition "has the great merit of being simple and easily understood. . . . Everyone is familiar with the terms Dosa, Guna and Alaṁkāra. By using them, Mammata conveys a tolerably clear and accurate idea of the character of poetry'.264 The Body Poetic Hemachandra mentions four kinds of words and correspondingly four kinds of senses in place of the threefold division espoused by Mammața, Viśvanatha and others. Mammaṭa classifies Gauni as a sub-division of Lakṣaṇa. Hemachandra's deviation, however, need not surprise us or detain us here because we have dealt with this earlier on. Prof. R. B. Athavale, however, criticises Hemachandra's division of Lakṣaṇā and opines that nothing much is achieved by separating Gauņi, 265 Hemachandra is businesslike in his treatment of the 'expressed sense'. He is unwilling to pursue any longer the discussion of the fourfold activity of the denotative word as it is not directly related to poetics. He, however, sticks to the Grammarian's view of Sanketa. While he follows Mammaṇa closely on Lakṣaṇā and Vyañjana, he altogether drops the purport-sense from the body of the text, though he discusses it in his Viveka. But Hemachandra takes the palm when he rejects Rūḍha Lakṣaṇā in favour of Prayojanavati Lakṣaṇa and maintains that all instances of the former are instances of primary meaning (Vacyartha). This is very true. For, as Paul Henle explains, a metaphor requires a clash of terms and Jain Education International 460 For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558