Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 58
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 124
________________ 114 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JUN, 1929 India. The tradition may be plain, it may be hoary, age-old, ancient or of time immemorial; it may be held sacred by the Malabar Christians or even by the whole of Christendom. Yet when we begin to scrutinize and argue about it, the burden of proof rests with those who stand by the tradition, although Dr. Thomas says (Y.M.I., November 1927, p. 654) that "when we are dealing with such a hoary and respected tradition, the onus probandi is on those who claim to disprove it." A strange statement indeed! How could the (onus) obligation (probandi) to prove a tradition rest on those who claim to disprove it? This would be an inversion of the established rules of evidence. On p. 41 of Y.M.I. for January, 1928, Dr. Thomas writes: "The plain question is, Have you any evidence to affirm that St. Thomas did not come to India or could not have come ; or that some one forged the tradition at some definite time and place ?" Let it be granted for argument's sake that there is no evidence. Nevertheless we can ask Dr. Thomas, -Have you any evidence to affirm that St. Thomas did come to South India ? I grant that St. Thomas could very well have come to South India. Why,-Asoka, or Mahendra, or Sanghamitra, or Alexander, or Megasthenes, or Cosmas, or Fa-hien, or Napoleon could have come to South India. But that does not imply that they did come. As regards my theory about an Edeggene missionary of perhaps king Abgar's time (circa 200), I then and there said (Ind. Ant., 1926, p. 222) that it was a "speculation which may or may not be correct." As I have said, "Let it by all means prove to be wrong. But that will not help St. Thomas' cause." (Y.M.I., December 1927, p. 735). Since Dr. Thomas and some others seem to be busy tilting against my speculation, instead of proving the much-vaunted South Indian tradition, I have already withdrawn the speculation. Let Dr. Thomas ignore my theory, and address himself to the task of proving that St. Thomas came to South India. For the enlightenment of scholars who do not know Syriac, Malayalam, Tamil, and Telugu in which languages the South Indian tradition is recorded, Dr. Thomas will do well to get the South Indian Thomistio documents translated into English and publish them as early as possible. Let such scholars have a chance of scrutinizing the “hoary and respected "tradition, and estimating it at its true worth.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408