Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 58
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 220
________________ 204 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY NOVEMBER, 1929 of the Christian era and are supposed to have originated in Bengal (Belvalkar RanadeHistory of Indian Philosophy, vol. II, p. 96-97). Advayasiddhi of Sridhara, which he refers to in his Nyâyakandali (p. 5, 1. 4), composed in 913 S.E., comes next. Probably next in chronological order is the Tattvamuktavalt Mayavada-sata-důşani (1.0., IV, C.S., III, 62), by one who calls himself Gauda Pärnananda Kavi-Chakravarti. In the Tattvamuktavali an attempt is made by a Bengalee to refute Sankara's theory of Máyá in 120 verses (JRAS, 1883, p. 137 ff.). The author must have flourished before the fourteenth century of the Christian era, when Madhavacharya composed his Sarva-darsana. sangraha, for the latter quotes it under Ramanuja-darsana (Bib. Ind. ed., p. 51). It should be noted here that with the rise of the Nyâya-Vaigesika system in Bengal, which sought to establish the existence of so many categories as against the monistio ideas of Sankara, the latter's theory of Maya was systematically made the target of the attacks of many a Bengalee scholar. Most of these attacks are scattered through the works of Nyâya-Vai eşika. But independent works were also composed on this topic, as is shown by the work already described. I should take this opportunity of referring to a similar work composed but recently. It is the Mayavadda-nirása of an erudite Nyâya scholar of the last generation, namely Pandit Rakhaladása Nyâyaratna. His work was published in 1912. It is not known if Gaudešvard-charya, guru of the great Vedanta scholar Chitsukhácharya (circa fourteenth century) had any connection with Bengal, as his name would lead one to suspect. But no work of his is known to have come down. A widespread influx of Vedântic thought over a large section of Bengal took place from after the time of Chaitanya. He was the founder of the Gauda school of Vaişnavism, which was primarily based on the Madhva school of VedAnta, though differing in some essential points from the latter. And the followers of the school produced a fair amount of Vedântio literature. They had their own commentary on the Vedanta-adtra, besides a good many independent works. A detailed acoount of their work in this direction will be found in & separate paper of mine in the Annals of Bhandarkar Research Inst. (vol. X, 117 ff.). . Of the contemporaries of Chaitanya, Vasudeva Sarvabhauma, originally teacher and subsequently follower of Chaitanya, wrote a commentary on the Advaita-makaranda of Lakşmidhara (L. 2854). Another contemporary of Chaitanya, though not a follower of his school, was the famous NaiyAyika Raghunatha Siromani. It is curious that he wrote a commentary on the well-known Vedanta work, the Khandana-khanda-khadya of Sri Harsa, for students of Nydya are found to take special pride in refuting the doctrines of VedAnta. To another, NaiyAyika GadAdhara, who came after Raghunatha, is generally attributed a Vedântic work called Brahma-nirnaya (Bühler-Catalogue of Sans. MSS. contained in the private Libraries of Gujardt, etc. IV, 72). But it cannot be stated if this Gadadhara is really identical with the famous Nyâya scholar of Bengal of the same name. The greatest name, however, of which Bengal can really feel proud, in the field of Vedanta literature is that of Madhusudana Sarasvati. His works, which are fairly large in number, are full of deep erudition and, as such, highly popular all over India even to this day. Though conflicting acmounts of him would render it difficult to determine the place he hailed from, tradition current among the orthodox scholars of Northern India in general and of Bengal in particular scarcely leaves any doubt as regards his Bengal origin. And Mr. P. C. Divanji, going into the details of all acoounts connected with his life, has been led by the balance of evidence to conclude that he was a Bengalee. (Annals of the Bhandarkar Research Institute, vol. VII, p. 149 ff.) The author of the present paper has legitimate ground for pride as he is fortunate in having been born in the very family that was adorned by Madhusudana. It is true none of Madhusûdana's well-known Vedanta works are found in Bengal, but this is due to the faot of his having renounced the world quite early in life and having carried on all his literary activities in Benares. Madhusudana flourished sometime about the sixteenth century.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408