Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 05
Author(s): E Hultzsch
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 142
________________ No. 15.] THREE GRANTS OF GOVINDACHANDRA. A-PALI PLATES OF GOVINDACHANDRA AND HIS MOTHER RÅLHANADÊVÎ, OF [VIKRAMA-JSAMVAT 1189. 113 These plates were found at the village of Pali in the Dhuriâpâr pargana of the Bânsgaon tahsil of the Gorakhpur district of the North-Western Provinces, and were in January 1895 presented to the Lucknow Museum by the Collector, Dr. Hoey, who had obtained them through Pirthipal Rai, the Zamindar. They are two in number, each of which measures about l' 11" broad by 10" high, and is inscribed on one side only. The plates have raised rims, and the writing, in consequence, is in an excellent state of preservation throughout. There is a ringhole in the centre of the lower part of the first plate and a corresponding hole in the centre of the upper part of the second plate, but the ring on which the plates were strung is missing. With the plates, however, is preserved a circular seal, about 24" in diameter, which bears in high relief, across the centre, the legend [r]mad-G[6]vindachandradeva, in Nagart letters about high; above the legend, the figure of a Garuda, squatting down and facing to the proper right; and below the legend, a conch-shell.- Each plate contains 17 lines of well executed writing. The size of the letters is about " The characters are Nagari, and the language is Sanskrit. As regards orthography, the letter b is everywhere denoted by the sign for v; the dental sibilant is frequently employed instead of the palatal, and the palatal occasionally instead of the dental; and j is used instead of y in the word júti, 1. 20. The inscription is one of the Paramabhattáraka Mahárájádhiraja Paramésvara Govindachandradeva. The king records in it that, after bathing in the Sati at the ghaffa of the god Svapnésvars, on the occasion of the Akshaya-tritiya festival in the bright half of the month Vaisakha, he made over to his mother, the Maharajní Balhanadevi, ten nálukas (of land) in the village of Guduvi, in the Goyara pattalá of the Onavala pathaka, as a gift for the Thakkura Jayapalasarman, son of the Thakkura Indrâditya and son's son of the Thakkura Pêvalaha, a Brahman of the Mudgala gotra, whose three pravaras were Mandgalya, Ângirasa and Bhârmyasva. The taxes specially mentioned (in line 26) as due to the donee are the bhagabhôgakara and pravanikara. In line 34 the inscription is dated, in figures only, on Saturday, the 8th of the dark half of Jyaishtha of the year 1189. The grant was written by the Thakkura Vishnu. The date in line 34 regularly corresponds, for the Kárttikádi Vikrama-Samvat 1189 expired and the purnimanta Jyaishtha, to Saturday, the 29th April A.D. 1133, when the 8th tithi of the dark half ended 15 h. 48 m. after mean sunrise. The preceding Akshaya-tritiya, on which the donation was made, fell on Sunday, the 9th April A.D. 1133, when the third tithi of the bright half of Vaisakha commenced 1 h. 17 m. and ended 23 h. 5 m. after mean sunrise. The localities I am unable to identify. From the present inscription it appears that the pattald, so often mentioned in cognate grants, was a subdivision of the pathaka, a term which does not occur in the inscriptions of the kings of Kanauj hitherto published, but which is met with also in another Påll plate of Govindachandra that will be referred to below. Another unusual term in this grant is náluka, in line 19. This word apparently is derived from, and is equivalent to, the Sanskrit nalva, a measure of distance equal to 400 (or, according to others. 100, or 120) hastas. The same term occurs, both in the form náluka and in the abbreviated form nálu, in the Kahla (now Lucknow Museum) plates of the (Kalachuri ?) Maharajá dhiraja Sodhadova, the successor of the Mahdrájádhirája Maryâdâsâgaradeva, of V. 1135, of which Dr. Führer has kindly sent me an impression. 1 In other inscriptions the name is both Rdlhanadért and Edlhaddot; see above, Vol. IV. p. 113. The tithi, on which the donation was made, therefore was a kahaya-tithi. See Gupta Insor. p. 178, note 1. See below, p. 114, note 4.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458