Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 41
________________ 26 Reals in the Jaina Metaphysics ing to the Vedāntist observer, the objects of perception are varied, each having a nature distinguished from the nature of others. Why should we look upon this experience of multiplicity as unreal? Why should we go against the yield of our perception and say that the objects of our experience although, appearing as varied, are not really varied at all ? The Vedāntists, of course, as we have seen, point out that our valid perception presents its object as positive only and that this goes to show that the one, non-dual positive Brahma is the only Real, underlying all the apparently varied objects of our experience. The Jainas repudiate this Vedāntist contention about the so-called positive (Vidhāyaka) character of the objects of experience. They point out that an object of our experience has certainly a positive character; but as affirmation is impossible without negation, the positive aspect of the character of a thing involves also a negative aspect. The perception of a Blue object is possible only as its differentiation from Yellow ones and so on. It is thus not correct to say that valid perception presents its object as abstract Existence; its positive character does not mean that it is devoid of distinctive contents of its own. Valid perception, according to the Jainas show that its object has a peculiar and individual nature of its own, distinguished from that of the other objects. The Nirvikalpa may consist in a consciousness of the barest Existence but it is too hazy and indistinct a mode of apprehension to be looked upon as a valid source of knowledge. We cannot depend upon the Nirvikalpa for a knowledge of the real nature of the things under observation. Our valid perception, on the contrary, shows that the things of our experience are not f:FFTTT, that the one, nondual Brahma is not the only Real, underlying all of them but that the universe is constituted of a multiplicity of Reals. We shall end this account of the Jaina criticism of the Vedāntic monism, with a quotation from Sri Ratnaprabha Suri's commentary: Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 ... 430