Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 177
________________ 162 Reals in the Faina Metaphysics such as, 'here there is no pitcher', etc. In the same way, the reason for the negative view of darkness and shadow cannot be put in this way, 'because these are due to causes which are different from those that produce a substance'. An effect, according to the Nyāya position is due to 'intimate' (Samavāyi), ‘non-intimate' (Asamavāyi) and 'immediate' (nimitta) pre-conditions. The Jaina thinkers object to this view of causation. Even admitting the Nyāya theory of causation, the negative view of darkness and shadow is hardly justifiable. (If you ask) What is the cause of darkness ?-(we may similarly ask) what do you say about the cause of light? (If you say that the causes of light are the molecules of light) (we may say, that the causes of darkness are) the molecules of darkness and shadow. Thirdly, the reason for the negative view of darkness and shadow cannot be said to be 'because darkness and shadow become apparent when light is said to be nonexistent'. For, it cannot be said to be a general rule that anything appearing when any other thing disappears must be an unsubstantial negation of the latter. It may also be pointed out that a similar line of argument would prove that light is but the negation of darkness. Light appears when darkness disappears. If it be contended that light has the positive attribute of heat it may be said that darkness also has the positive attribute of coolness. How then can it be said that darkness is but the negation of light? The fourth argument in support of the negative view of darkness is thus expressed by Samkara and Nyāyabhusaņa. The conditions that are requisite for the perception of light are found to be requisite also for the perception of darkness; hence the former is a substance while the latter is its unsubstantial negation. The Jaina thinkers point out that a similar line of arguments would show that light is but the unsubstantial negation of darkness and that a pitcher and cloth would be but unsubstantial negations of each other. Fifthly, the reason for the negative conclusion about darkness is said to be 'because there is no cause productive of the alleged substance of darkness'. Srīdhara points out that there cannot be any Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430