Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 183
________________ 168 . Reals in the Jaina Metaphysics ception, as a result of which, we come to understand that cow is the animal signified by the word cow. A word is thus not directly related to the object signified by it. NYĀYA CRITICISM OF THE MIMĀMSĀ THEORY OF SOUND The philosophers of the Nyāya school also object to the Mīmāṁsā theory of words. They point out that if there were a relationship of Prāpti (an essential relationship between the two related, such that one yields the other) between the word and its object, our mouth would have been filled with food as soon as the word, food, was uttered; our mouth would have been burnt as soon as the word, fire was uttered and our mouth would have been pierced as soon as the word, sword was uttered. पूरणप्रदाहपाटनानुपपत्तेश्च सम्वन्धाभावः। २-१-५३ न्यायसूत्रम् । Similarly, when there is an object, we do not find any vocal organs or effort to make sounds,—with the result that there is no sound. As Vātsāyana points out: perffapiszta sfą 7417FTTHATS OTTUTHI Different nationalities use the same word in different senses, which shows that there is no fixed relationship between a particular word and a particular object. The Naiyāyika's point out that if a word and its object were essentially related, the meaning of the former would have been clear to all; but this is not the case. A word signifies its object only to him who knows its meaning already, which indicates that the relation between the word and the object is not essential but one established and built up by an agency external to them. The Nyāya philosophers reject also the Mīmāṁsā doctrine of the eternity and the substantiality of sound. They point out that a sound and for the matter of that, a word is generated by material masses coming against and separating from each other; it is found to come to an end when it is no longer heard; the intensiy of a sound varies or can be made to vary. As regards the Mimāṁsā contention about the re-emergences of the same sound, the Naiyāyika's point out that we have never the self-same Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430