Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 288
________________ Soul 273 by admitting the super-material reality of the Jiva and by attributing real existence to it. JAINA ARGUMENTS In criticism of the Kṣanika (momentary) doctrine of the Buddhist thinkers, the Jaina's point out that Smrti or Recollection is impossible, if the soul be denied. Sensations, according to the Buddhists are absolutely self-identical or particularistic (Svalakṣaṇa), so that if it were possible for one such sensation to revive another, it should also be possible for the perceptions of one man to be recollected by another man. The Buddhists no doubt urge here that Recollection is possible only where the reviving sensation and the revived sensation are causally connected and thus belong to the one and the same series or Santana. But the Jaina's contend that since according to the Buddhists themselves, the Sensations are Svalakṣaṇa or absolutely different from each other they cannot urge that one sensation can in any way revive another. Besides, there is no rule that where the two ideas are causally related, one must revive the other, and that where the two ideas are not causally related, one cannot revive the other. Further, the Jaina's point out that if Sensations be absolutely selfidentical and there be no Soul underlying, connecting and persisting in and through them, two fallacies viz:-'Fruition of what was not done' (Akṛitābhyāgama) and ‘Annihilation of what was done' (Krtaprāṇāśa) become irresistible. Worship of the shrine is a pious act, according to the Buddhists and they say that one, worshipping the shrine, gets Happiness as the effect of his pious act. Now, the cognition that worshipped the shrine perishes, for all sensations are momentary, according to the Buddhists; the question then is, Who or what is it that enjoys the fruits of the shrineworship? This is Krtaprāṇāśa or annihilation of what is done. On the other hand, the cognition consisting in the enjoyment of the alleged happy effect of the shrine-worship, is in no way connected with the cognition of the shrineworship itself; how then can it be said to enjoy the fruit 18 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430