Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 138
________________ Matter of the Indians is not gross air but is the material background of our tactile sensibility. And lastly, Ākāśa conceived as a material Bhūta is not even ether, a gross substance after all in an extremely fine form but is what makes possible our sensations of sound. BHŪTAS ARE NOT BITS OF GROSS MATTER The Guna's or the attributes, possessed by the Bhuta's, really imply that they lie implicit in the latter; in other words, the Bhuta's are conceived as ultimate substances which evolve or give rise to the various qualitative phenomena, e.g. colour, taste, etc. which are associated with the gross objects of our experience. The Bhuta's of Indian philosophy thus are not gross substances of matter in finer forms, as with the Greeks but are substances which are infinitely more subtle than the elements of the non-Indian thinkers and which may as well be looked upon as almost immaterial, being the barest background of the material qualities of colour, smell etc. that are met with in the gross bodies. BUT BACKGROUNDS OR POSSIBILITIES Jain Education International 123 OF For Private & Personal Use Only ARE PERCEPTIONS It may be urged against us that our above contention is unwarranted. The Indian Bhuta's have been definitely said to be possessed of the attributes of colour, taste, etc. This clearly shows that the Indian conception of Pṛthvi is that it is a smelling substance, that of Ap is that it is a liquid substance and so on. It would thus appear that if the elements of the Greeks were gross matters in their finer forms, the Indian Bhuta's also were no less So, the gross sensible qualities of colour etc. being attributed to them. We venture to submit that this objection is founded on a misconception of the nature of inherence of qualities in a substance. It is true that if the material quality of colour, for instance, be found in an explicit form in a thing, the thing is bound to be gross. But the qualities of a substance may not always be explicit in it. Even then, the Indian thinkers do as a SENSE www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430