Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

Previous | Next

Page 163
________________ 148 Reals in the Jaina Metaphysics We are always to remember that an atom is absolutely simple, Niravayava. A gross or Sāvayava substance when combining with another may be supposed to have parts of it combined with the parts of the other. But in the case of the combination of simple substances, this supposition would be wrong. Simple substances combine because they have the capacity to combine. In this connection the Nyāya thinkers point out that Samyoga does not necessarily imply that the things in contact with each other must have parts. In the case of our perception, we talk of a contact between the soul and the mind, none of which has any parts. It is true that atoms combining with a particular given atom come from different directions of it and that thereby the given atom appears as if it has parts in its different directions. This is, however, a mere supposition, an imaginary conception helpful to our understanding of atomic combination. It is called 'Bhāgabhakti', a false idea that there are parts where in reality there are no parts. The real state of affairs however is that an atom is absolutely Niravayava, that its combination with another is due to its inherent capacity to combine and that the phenomena of atomic combination does not necessitate the supposition that atoms are constituted of parts. NYAYA THEORY OF COMBINATION OF ATOMS The Naiyāyika's point out that although the atoms are insensible, it is possible for their combination to produce a massive thing. The Vaibhāșika's held out that our experience of massiveness or Mahatva is based on a comparative estimate. One atom may be insensible; a combination of two atoms also may be insensible but a combination of many more atoms will give us the perception of a massive thing. Massiveness according to them does not pertain to the nature of the thing. We call a certain thing massive, as opposed to an insensuous substance because the former is found to have greater quantitative stuff than the latter. Mahatva or massiveness is thus different from Anutva or atomicness only in degree or quantity—not in kind and the Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430