Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 45 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 83
________________ APRIL, 1916] THE HISTORY OF THE NAIK KINGDOM OF MADURA 75 settlement of the afflicted province. Besides building the city of Tinnovelly and its suburb Palamkôta and furnishing it with temples, he replaced the miserable and wretched cottages which lined the l'âmbraparoi banks and which had been owned by the indigenous cultivators, by regular and well-built villages of Brahman colonists from the north. It was a measure most pregnant in after consequences, and the descendants of these colonists remain to the present day the owners of much of the best lands, and the most intelligent, influential and cultivated section of Hindu Society in Tinnevelly. His liberality also endowed, in other parts of the province, lands for Brahman agraharams, and bis enlightened agrarian policy carried out as many irrigation works from the Tâmbraparni as from the Vaigai. The security of the people was also safeguarded by the establishment of a vigorous and efficient police. The death and character of Visvanatha. All this work meant ceaseless activity, restless energy, which even the iron frame of Visvanatha could not endure. Worn out by war and work, the cares of defence and statecraft, he gave up his life in the midst of his labours at evidently a comparatively early age of about 55 or 60. Enough has been said to shew that he had so regulated his behaviour as to win the affection of his people and made his death keenly felt by them. He was an uncommon statesman with all the elements of greatness in his character. With the right apprehension of the needs and necessities of the times and a clear grasp of the means whereby they could be satisfied, he had set to work with a firm will and broadminded sympathy, evolved order out of chaos and a powerful kingdom out of a confused collection of refractory and turbulent vassal-states, into which Madura was then, owing to the degeneration of the Pandyan kings into mere phantoms of royalty, practically divided. His work of construction and consolidation was so thorough that, in spite of the frequent revolutions to which the country was then habituated and in spite of the incompetence of many of his successors, the kingdom which he established lasted for two centuries. Bold, active, generous, kind and tactful, Viấyanatha Naik was a man of versatile talents, endowed with a personal magnetism which enshrined him in the hearts of his subjects, and enabled him to leave a deep impression on the history of south India. The best trophy which posterity has erected to his memory is his statue in the Vasanta Mantapa of Sundarêśvara's temple in Madura, worshipped even to-day by numberless people, who know only vaguely that Maha Rajâ Mânya Sri Visvanatha Nâikan Aiyan Averga! was the great Karta of Madura in days of old, but who do not know how great and good he actually was. (To be continued.) 6 Tinnevelly Manual, p. 70. It has been already pointed out that he was born in the beginning of the 16th century or a decade before. He could not have been more than 60 at the time of his death in 1563. There is no basis what. ever to believe that Visvanatha diod, as Wheeler says, in the field of battle. (Wheeler's Hist., Vol. V., pt. II, p. 574.) The Hist. Oarna. Dynas. Asigns Visvanatha's death to 1458 A. D., which is of course absurd. The * Supple. M. S." agrees with it. The Pand. Chron. says that he ruled from Raudri Margali to Dundumi, i. e. for the space of 2 years and 4 months, and from Budhirdikdri down to Angirana, his son Kumara Krishpappa was in power. (Rudhirókari=1663-4). Mirtanjya M. s., ("Royal line of the Carnataca princes") gives a more accurate date. It says that on Tai II, Rudhirdikdri, Visvanatha caused his son to be anointed. It seems from this that the Karte was alive when his son was anointed. Most probably he was on his death-bed and wanted to see his son on the throne before his death. It must have been soon after his death that Kumara Krishnappa gave the 8 villages mentioned in the Krishnapuram temple inscription. (Inson. 17 of 1912). See Ep. Rep., 1913, p. 17. According to Sewell Visvanatha's death was in December 1563. (Antiquities, II, p. 201).Page Navigation
1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380