Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 45
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 114
________________ 106 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JUNE, 1916 therefore summoned him to his presence and bestowed upon him the title of Udayan Setupati, together with the robes and ornaments, and the banners and ensigns, of royalty. We are further informed that in the warm affection which the king felt to his new favourite, he permitted him to leave his capital only after personally consecrating him to his viceroyalty with the holy water of the Ganges. Thus it was that the obscure chief of Pogalûr found himself (like his ancestors ) all at once the governor of the whole Marava country. From this time onward, the Setupati had a very close relation with Madura. The most powerful of her feuda tories, he naturally became the leader of the seventy-two Polygars. From the position of a village magnate he becamo a king with the retinues and the paraphernalia of royalty. The title Setupati, hitherto an emblem of past glory rather than of present power, became a real indicator of the actual fact. All this credit is due to the ability of Sadayakka, a man who by his character and conduct more than fulfilled the expectations of his master. A man of energy and fire, of great activity and martial valour, he undertook a crusade against turbulent vassals and reduced them to subjection. The important villages of Vadakku Vatalai. Kala Vâr Kovil and Pattamangalam, once the homes of disloyalty, now became harmless and contented abodes of men. Besides ensuring order in the land, Sada yakka reclaimed a large quantity of waste lands and utilised them for purposes of cultivation and occupation. He erected mud fortifications at Poga!ûr and at Râmnâd, and maintained an efficient police for the safety of the pilgrims. He also repaired and enlarged the temple of Râmeávaram, and made numerous endowments to it,45 earning thereby the gratitude of the thousands who devoutly visited it every year. He ruled for the space of 16 years and was succeeded by his son, the celebrated Kûttan, in 1621. 13 Some scholars dispute this. One Mr. J. L. W., who contributes two able articles on the Maravas to the Calcutta Review (1878-1892), says, like Mr. Boyle, that the absence of evidences and inscriptions previous to Swayakka and the awkward way" in which he is introduced into history, show that there had been no setupatia before him; that he was in fact the founder of the line; and that the accounts of imperial wars and alliances as given in the chronicles are all fabrications. (See Calcutta Review, 1878. p. 448). Jr. Boyle is of the same opinion. He asks “If the youth (dalayakka) had sprung from a royal line, if he only continued the long descent of an immemorial house, what need was there for this legend ? But if the chronicle had to explain the rise of modern family, and the origin of an obscure race of princes, what moro natural than to conceal those humble beginnings under a veil of fable; and to prove that the modern family was only the restoration, under divine favour, of an illustrious house"! (Calcutta Reviete 1874, p. 38). Mr. Boyle further points out that there are no inscriptions or buildings in the Ráme varam temple attributed to anybody before Sallayakka; and that this total absence of monumental records is against the theory of an old and independent dynasty. While there is much in these contentions, it seems, however, that these writers have gone astray. Tradition cannot be so entirely discorded. The awkward story" of the Udayan, on which they base much of their criticism is after all given only in some family chronicle and not in the record of the Carnatic Governors. We may therefore not give much credence to it. As regards sudden elevation from obscurity, we need not wonder at it, as it was quite natural in an age of vicissitudes and frequent revolutions. 4 Sodayakka was evidently confirmed in the privilege of issuing coins of his own in imitation of the Madura Naik coins. See chapter XI. 45 In 1607 and 1608. See Antiquitier, I, 300, II, 6. Madr. Ep. Nep., 1911, p. 89.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380