Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 45
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 113
________________ JUNE, 1916] THE HISTORY OF THE WAIK KINGDOM OF MADURA 105 The restoration of the Sotupatis. The seven years' rule of Muttu Krishnappa, however, was noted for one important event which transpired therein. This was the establishment or rather restoration of the Setupatis of Râmnad. The great Visvanatha I. or one of his successors had appointed two comunissioners to secure the peace of the province, to evolve order out of the chaos into which it had drifted, to clear the overgrown forests, and to maintain a police for the protection of travellers. So long as Aryanátha lived, this arrangement seems to have fulfilled the object of its introduction; but on his death in 1600 the province once again fell into anarchy. The commissioners were powerless, the vassals turbulent, and the people oppressed and discontented. Travellers had, owing to the abundance of thieves and forests, a hard time. The sådhus, bhairagis, and pilgrims thereupon proceeded to Madura, waited on Muttu Krishnappa, and prayed to him to restore Sa layakka Ulayan, a scion of the ancient line of the Setupatis, to the throne of his ancestors. A story, told of almost every Indian who rose froin poverty and obscurity to opulence and renown, and therefore of doubtful veracity, is told of Sa layakka Ulayan. He was barely twelve when he had the fortune of reriving the greatness of his ancestors and this, we are toll, was foresha lowed by a marvellous experience of his. The boy was found asleep beneath a tamarind tree, with his face protected by a cobra from the rays of the sun ; and the Lada Chakravartin, who happened to be an eye-witness of the marvel, at once interested himself in him, and secured for him, by means of his intercession with Muttu Krishna, the ancestral throne of Ramal. A less romantic but more rational version ascribes the honour of restoring the Setupatis, not to the chief of the saints, but to the chief guru of King Muttu Krishnappa. The teacher, it says, once went on a pilgrimage to Râmèsvaram, and received throughout the journey the solicitous attention and secure guidance of Sadayakka Ulayan, the Chief of Pogalûr. The gratitude of the worthy Brahman sought a means of repayment, and obtained for him not only an interview with his royal pupil, the monarch of Madura, but also the grant of certain villages with robes and presents of honour. On his departure from the Court, Sarlayak ka strengthened himself by fortifying Pogalûr, and then, subduing and taking possession of all the anarchical disorderly country, reducing the inhabitants under his own loninion. He also collected a considerable sum of money in this country in the way of taxes, and brought it to Muttu Krishnappa Naik,"2 Gratified by this conduct, the king gave him an unrestricted grant of additional lands, ordered him to clear the forests for cultivation, and communicated to the people his choice of Sarlayakka, as the chief to whom their allegiance in future was due. According to this ordinance, continues the chronicle, adayakka assembled a large force, and, with its aid, overthrew a greater tract of country, th: revenue from which he used partly for his own expenses and partly as a tribute to the king. This loyal and honourable conduct gratified the heart of Muttu Krishnappa, who 41 According to Nelson, he was the grandson of the last setupati " who had been murdered by one of the last Pandyas who preceded Visvanatha Niyakkan." In his Antiquities Sewell gives an inscription of 1599 belonging to one Dalavai Stupati Kattir (Vol. II, 5), who made a grant of eight villages to the temple of Ramanatha Svåmi; but the cyclic year Parabhava and 1599 do not agree. Copper plates 11 and 12 of 1910-11, which record gifts of as many as 13 villages to the Rimanáths Svami temple at Râmêsvarsm, mention this Daļavâi Setupati Katta Tovar in 1607 and 1608. Dalavdi Setupati seems to be thus another name for Sadayakka. See Ep. Rep. 1911, p. 16. 42 Ibid. p. 29.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380