Book Title: Samayasara
Author(s): Kundkundacharya, Hiralal Jain, A N Upadhye
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 161
________________ 32 SAMAYASĀRA In any case, identifying one's Self with these material objects is but a mark of the lack of knowledge as to the real nature of things. But if you say that the soul and the physical objects are not so very different in nature as to exclude all possible relations between the two, then you have to remember that your view would be in conflict with the Divine Word of the Sarvajía, or the Omniscient. According to the pravacana, the soul is fundamentally different in nature from pudgala (matter). Its nature is characterised by perfect knowledge and perfect perception, whereas matter is non-living, acetana, a characteristic which is contradictory to that of the soul. With such an incompatability of nature, how can they be reasonably identified with each other ? If your predication, “This is mine" is maintainable, it must be only on this condition, which is impossible, viz., that the soul can be transmuted into matter and matter into the soul. It is clear that the author addresses a deluded person, (bahir-ātmā) who is incapable of discriminating between soul and matter, and points out to him the fundamental differences between the two. It is the clear perception of this difference, vivekajñāna that forms the foundation of Right Faith. Next the author states the possible defects which may be pointed out against the view that the Self and the body are absolutely distinct from each other. जदि जीवो ण सरीरं तित्थयरायरियसंथुदी चेव । सव्वावि हवदि मिच्छा तेण दु आदा हवदि देहो ॥२६॥ jadi jivo na sarīram titthayarāyariya-sainthudi ceva savvāvi havadi micchã teņa du ādā havadi deho (26) यदि जीवो न शरीरं तीर्थ कराचार्यसंस्तुतिश्चैव । सर्वापि भवति मिथ्या तेन तु आत्मा भवति देहः ॥२६॥ 26. If the soul is not the body then the hymns praising (the bodily excellence, rūpastava, of) the Tirthamkara or the Ācārya will all be false. Therefore the soul must indeed be the body. COMMENTARY · The Tirthamkara as distinguished from Siddha has a body. Siddha is described as aśarīrī, without a body, arūpī, not perceivable, and so on; whereas the Tirthamkara or Arhat Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370