Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 53 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 35
________________ FEBRUARY, 1924) Á SKETCH OF SOUTH INDIAN CULTURE 29 To illustrate what is meant by 'unswerving duty, 'the Professor relates the universal story in South India of an ignorant hunter known as Kannappa Nayanar, who plucked out his eye to replace an eye of an image of Siva, which he thought was ailing. “In the cult of Bhakti the first feature to be taken notice of is unalloyed affection for God, and this affection springs from the notion that God looks after a man with an affectionate interest superior even to that of himself, and therefore deserves the return of unqualified devotion." It is devotion and not works that is efficacious to evoke God's grace, and "this extraordinary affection for God springs in a human being as a result of deeds in a previous existence without regard to the fruit thereof and as the result of Siva's grace and that grace alone." Wherever such affection exists there Siva is bound down to the offer of this devotion. It matters nothing how it is shown, or whether by the ignorant or the learned. Singleness of purpose makes even an objectionable form of worship acceptable. An addition to this early form of faith was developed gradually. It became necessary for a teacher " to make Bhakti exclusively the method of the attainment of God's favour." To secure the roquired ebullition of emotion visits to places of holy reputation, acts of menial service in temples, pouring out the heart in verse, and dancing were introduced and fostered. And later on there appeared the saving priest or procoptor as an essential factor in the attainmont of salvation, till without his aid the proper kind of Siva's grace became impossible of reception. All this was taught in a great body of religious verse and in fourteen philosophio treatises, the Saiva-sdstras. The former founded the systems of the religion and the latter provided the philosophy "to maintain it against controversialists of other croeds." Unorthodox Saivism has always prevailed in Southern India, differing from the orthodox "mainly in the vigour with which it carries out single-minded devotion to the form or aspect of Siva, to which their sectarians devote themselves. Some of the Northern sects have flourished since the days of the Pallaves, and they are grouped togother generally as Virasaivas, but those who are now specifically termed Vira Saivas (Lingayats) rone in the 12th century A.D. in the Kakatiya country of Telingana. It was a reform movement for the abolition of caste and the removal of certain social restrictions. The more orthodox Vira-Saivism was a Brahman movement which subordinated Vedic rites to porsonal devotion (bhakti). This sect was the Aradhya of the Telugu country. Tho better known and commoner sect was the Lingayat, who followed Basava, the Brahman Ministor of the Kalachůrya usurper Bijjala, who stole the throne in 1156 AD. Basava came from the Bijapur District in the Southern Maratha country, and was followed in tho leadership of his seot by his nephew Channa Basava. Such is the acceptod tradition, but the Professor draws attention to early epigraphio records, which go to show that a Brahman named Ekântada (Singlo-minded) Ramayya of the Dharwar District and of about Basava's time, was the real founder of the Lingayats. Ho concludes the discussion by remarking that "it is likoly that Ramayya was responsible for really originating this sect," taken up by the Minister Basava, organised by him and carried into actual practice. The Lingayats have their own canon, and flourished greatly during the Vijayanagar Empire, and the Professor winds up his disquisition on the Vîra Saivas with a noteworthy suggestion: "Saivism, like Vaishnavism, began in tho South during the historical poriod, not as a systematised religion or creed, but merely as the oonvictions of individual mon, who could give expression to their own convictions in felicitous language, full of overflowing omotion." This was the condition of both religions between A.D. 200 to 1000. The Pallava times occupied most of this period.Page Navigation
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 392