Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 53
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 153
________________ JULY, 1924) HISTORICAL GLEANINGS FROM THE KAUTILIYA 145 have been so called, because his father was called Virasena, and his two children were called Indrasena and Indrasena, i.e., they had names connected with the word) sena. If, therefore, of (971) the legends contained in the Kautiliya, six ooour in a corresponding form in the Mahabharata, five in a divergent form, and three are wanting there, we must therefrom conclude, that the stock of legends had passed through a change during the period intervening between the time of Kautilya and its redaction in the Mahabharata ; the older form of the story preserved by Kautilya regarding the destruction of the Vrsnis, proves in particular that there did not still exist a reaction of the Mahabharata ascribed to Vyâsa Krona Dvai payant, or that it had not still attained to any canonical recognition in the Brahmanic circles. However from another point of view, it can be proved from the Kautilya that the art of epic poetry itself had reached a high degree of perfection in the fourth century B.C. The metre of the Kauçiltya generally agrees exactly enough with that of the Ramayana.39 In the three hundred flokus in the Kauçiliya, there are to be found the following numbers of Vipulás: I, 36 ; II, 27; III, 53 ; IV, 3. In the second Vipula, the final syllable is always long, in the first, only one short, p. 217; in the third, twelve times, in the fourth, twice. The caesura in the third Vipula falls six times on a saindhi vowel, once, on the fourth. For comparison, I may inention the same phenomena in the Ramayana (the first hundred pages of Schlegel, part II) and those in Nala, the numbers in the brackets giving the vanishing cases of the short final syllable. Ramayana, I, 50 (1); II, 50 (0); III, 40 (12); IV, 2 (1); Nala, I, 136 (8); II, 59 (2); III, 60 (27); IV, 17 (3); V, 1( - - ). The receding of the fourth Vipulâ, and the marked continuance of the long vowel at the end of the second and fourth Vipul& in the Kautillya, place that work in closer relation to the motrical practice of the Ramayana than to that of the Mahabharala. In this direction too, point the seven Triştubh ślokas to be found in the Kauçiliya : they are correct Indravajra and Upendravajrå slokas; and none of them of a free construction. Probably the Adikávyam, the Ramayana was already existing, under the influence of which, the decisive employment of the sloka metre in poetry seems to have been brought about. It can however be supposed that there also existed then other Kavyas. Though indeed we do not come across anything regarding Kavyas and literary dramas 10 in the Kautiliya, still (972) the dramas and the Buddhacarita of Ašvaghoşa make it plausible that these classes of literature had behind then a long develop ment before the second century B.C., and that therefore they may reach back to the fourth century. Finally I may bring together what we can gather from the Kaufiliya regarding the contemporaneous literature. Besides the Vedic literature and what belonged to it, the Triyarga was treated of in systematic works : Dharmasdatra (nientioned I. 5, p. 10; III. 1, p. 150). Arthasdatra and Kamasastra (see above, p. 963 f. p. 134 f. of this translation). Of the philosophical systems there were existing, Sankhya, Yoga and Lokayata, though we know There is a pada of soven syllables on p. 413, which is probably an error of the MS, or of the edition. Two nine-syllable padas occur on pp. 418 and 420 in magic formulie. Theo T naturally leave out of con sideration. Verso 4 on p. 249 ( 261) is presented in its second pdda in & garbled form. 40 There is of course no question hero of professional bards, story tellers, nimic actors, who are prentioned ofton enough ; compare Hertel, 1.c., p. 422, but only of authors (to mention whcm, Kautilya bød no occasion). As regards the Sutas and Magadhas, I might mention that there were two classes of them to be distinguished from each other: (1) the usual, who according to the theory are pratiloma casten (namely, Vaibya and Brahmani, Ksatriya and(1), and (2) thoso called Paurdnika, arising from the inter-marriages of the first two chalet. (III, 7, p. 166).

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392