Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 53
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 207
________________ SEPTEMBER, 1934 KOTTAYAM PLATE OF VIRA RAGHAVA CHAKRAVARTI 195 visited India in 1031, has written an elaborate treatise on the Indian Astronomical systems, giving the revolutions of the Sun, the Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus and Saturn and their apsides in a Chaturyuga and in a Kalpa according to the different sidhantas. Alberuni says that Varahamihira, the author of Panchasidhantika, lived 526 years before his time, which is Kali 4131, A.D. 1031 (Alberuni's India, Vol. II, p. 276). The date of Varahamihira, therefore, is A.D. 505. His Panchasidhantika, it should be observed, was & summary of the five systems of Astronomy, which were in India. Arya bata, the author of Aryabattyam, was according to himself born in Kali 3577, A.D. 476 477, and wrote his book in Kali 3600, A.D. 499–500, at the age of 23. This is the system adopted in Malabar. We thus find that the Indians began to interest themselves in the study of Astronomy much before the commencement of the Christian era, and that the five sidhantas (systems of Indian Astronomy) came into existence before the sixth century. Corrections of the systems.--Secondly, some argue that since the Indian Astronomical systems constantly underwent corrections, the real dates cannot be ascertained from Astro. nomical positions given in ancient inscriptions. It is true that corrections were made in thene systems from time to time. But in Keralam we have two systems, known by the names of parahitam and drk. The latter is the correct system for calculating modern datee, the former is the old system which is now used only to find out muhurtham (auspicious time). It can be shown that the parahita system, holds good for all the ancient dates. I have myself verified twenty-eight ancient dated inscriptions from the tenth century forward, which contain Astronomical positions. Out of these inscriptions I have verified, only nine were found to be wrong. The mistakes, I think, must be due to wrong readings. I could not prove this, because no facsimiles were available. Some of the other inscriptions, too, appeared to be wrong at first, but when I compared the facsimile with the readings, I found that the mistakes were due to the latter. I did not find a single inscription which is not correct according to the parahita system, where a facsimilo was available to verify the reading. Then again I took 126 eclipses in the Astronomy of J. Ferguson, Vol. I, pp. 214-216, during a period of 1000 years from the first to the eleventh century, and verified them. These eclipses were observed in different parts of the world and recorded, with the dates con verted into the Christian era and the time into the Greenwich meantime by modern scholars. Of the 125 eclipses, all were correct except twenty-one.. I need hardly say that I desregarded the difference of two or three hours. Because all one can do is to find out the point of time when the new or full moon is completed in Keralam, though an eclipse is not really for a point of time. According to Indian Astronomy, time is calculated from sunrise. These and some other things may cause difference of one or two hours. The twenty-one eclirees, which were found incorrect, may be brought under four heads. Under the first head there is only one which is quite right, exoept for the fact that it was a solar eclipse instead of a lunar one (A.D. 1010, March 8. Greenwich meantime 5:41). Having found the day and time correct, it can be concluded that the mistake is only a misprint. Under the second head there are eleven eclipses : A.D. 1, June 10, G.M.T. 1.10. 1 A.D. 55, July 12, G.M.T. 2150. A.D. 30, Nov. 13, G.M.T. 19-20. A.D. 56, Deo. 25, G.M.T. 0-28. A.D. 46, July 21, G.M.T. 22:25. A.D. 60, Oct. 13, G.M.T. 3.21. A.D. 49, May 20, G.M.T. 7.16. A.D. 65, Dec. 15, G.M.T. 21:50. A.D. 53, March 8, G.M.T. 20-42. A.D. 70, Sept. 22, G.M.T. 2113. A.D. 760, Aug. 30, G.M.T. 5.50. These are Astronomical days. June 10 begins at noon of that day. The dates are correct, but there are differences of some hours, the maximum being not more than eight. These also may therefore be classed among the correct ones. Of this

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392