Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 14
Author(s): John Faithfull Fleet, Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 219
________________ JULT, 1835.) BARODA PLATES OF DHRUVA II. OF SAKA 757. 197 Of this grant, only the last two plates are now extant, each measuring about 114" by 74". The edges of them are fashioned somewhat thicker, so as to serve as rims to protect the writing, and the inscription is in a state of excellent preservation almost throughout. The grant originally consisted of four plates. This is shewn-1, by the size of the two extant plates, which is such that the earlier part of the genealogy would cover three sides, not only one;- and 2, by a point noticed by Mr. Fleet, when he had the original plates under examination viz., that the last plate has four notches, and the last but one has three, on its lower edge. The rings and seal of the grant are not forthcoming. The third plate begins with the second half of a stanza treating of Krishna I. The loss of the two first plates is of little moment; as those stanzas of the Vasasávali, which must have been on the missing plates, are already sufficiently well known. The Vanniávali of this now inscription comprises the following kings' names A. Direct Line. [Krishnaraja 1.] (RAțhor grant No. III.), and in the Bagumrå inscription of Krishna II. dated Saka 810 (Rathor grant No. IV.). The fact that this omission occurs in a grant originating with the second Karka's own son, brings almost to a certainty Professor Bühler's conjecture,' that Govinda IV. was a usurper, and therefore was ignored by the direct descendants of Karka IL In the prose portion of the inscription (line 28-29) the expression is, that the Brahman Yoga, in whose favour the grant was made, had received the title of (court)- astrologer, after (his father's death), from the illustrious Govindarajade v a.' Hereby, of course, the king Govinda III., belonging to the direct line (Saka 726-35),' might be understood. Bat, even if the usurper Govinda IV. was meant-which is much more likely,---yet this involuntary mention of the name, that is wanting in the Varsávali, would rather confirm than discredit Professor Bühler's view. According to the undoubtedly correct reading of this new inscription and of the inscription No. IV.) Amoghavarsha, in stanza 10, must not be taken as a secondary name of Karka II., but must be understood as referring to his cousin and feudal lord Sarva-Amoghavarsha (Saka 736-99), who belonged to the direct line of the Rashtrakūtas. Karka II. supported the latter successfully in war against "the tributary RÅshtraktas, who, after they had voluntarily promised obedience, dared to rebel with a powerful army." It is, I take it, beyond doubt, that, by "the rebellious Rashtrakatas," we must understand Govinda IV. and his followers; and that Karka II., in conjunction with Sarva, succeeded in overthrowing the usurper Govinda IV., and in ruling a second time over Gujarat as the Vassal of Sarva, just as we know he did for. merly as the vassal of Govinda III. So far I have tacitly assumed that Karka II. was the father of Dhruva II. Acoording to the inscription No. III., Indrs III. was followed by his son Karka II. (stanza 26), and the latter by his son Karka III. (stanzas 27 to 29), who was again suoceeded by his son Dhruva II. (ntansa 30). In the inscription No. I., wo find • ante Vol. XIII. p. 65. ante Vol. XII. p. 180. • ante Vol. XI. P. 198, Vol. XII. p. 13. anth Vol. XII. p. 916, Vol. XIII. p. 182: ante Vol. XII. p. 158. Govindardja II., also called Vallabha. Dhruvardja I. Govindaraja III. B. Gujardt Branch. Indraraja III. Mahardja Sarva, Karkarája II. also called Amoghavarsha. DhruvarAja II., also called Nirupama, and Dhårdvarsha. The contents of the last two stanzas of the Vanaidvali (13, 14), which are the only fresh ones, are of an entirely general character. Nevertheless, we gain from this new inscription number of important historical facts. The second Karka's younger brother, Govinda IV., who issued the Kavi grant of Salos 749 (Professor Bühler's Rathor grant No. 1.).. is left out; as is also the case in the Bagum. rl inscription of Dhruva III. dated Saka 789 · The numbering of the plates, the lithograph of which was not prepared under the management of the prosent Editors, should nooordingly be altered from II.., fi.b, III. ad III.b, to III.A, ILI., IV., and IV.b. ante Vol. V. p. im. ante Vol. XII. p. 179. T

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418