________________
850
THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY.
[DECEMBER, 1885.
indicate that at this latter time the Thakuris already exhibited in the inscriptions of Sivadêva again acknowledged a certain amount of su- I. and Jishgugupta. periority on the part of the Lichchhavis. Or In conclusion, Pandit Bhagwanlal Indraji's it may be nothing more than another expression "Table of the Lichchhavi Kings of "Népål"45 of the mutual courtesy of the two families, requires to be entirely recast, thus :
TABLE OF THE EARLY RULERS OF NEPAL. THE LICHCHHAVI OR SURYAVAMSI FAMILY
THE THAKURI FAMILY OF MANAGRIHA.
OF KAILASAKUTABHAVANA. | 1. Jayadeva I.-About A.D.
330-355.
- co
Names not re- A.D.
corded in the 355.630. inscription.)
Sivadêva I., Mahd-13. Vrishadêra.--About A.D.Amisuvarman, Mahdadrdja.-A.D. 637. 630-655.
manta, and afterwards Maharajadhirdja.-A. D. 637, 640, 645, and
651 (P) Dhruvadeva, Maha-14. Samkaradêva, son of pre- Jishnugupta.-A.D. 654. rája.-A.D. 654.
ceding.-About A.D.
655-680. 15. Dharmadêva, son of pre
Udayadêva.-About A. ceding.--About A.D.
D. 675-700. 680-704. 16. Manadêva, son of preced
Narendradêva, son of ing.-A.D.705 and 732.
preceding - About A.
D. 700-724 17. Mahideva, son of pre
Śivadêra II., Maharajd. ceding.- About A.D.
dhirdja, son of pre733-753. .
ceding.-A.D. 725 and
749 (P). 18. Vasantasêna, or Vasanta
Jayadeva II., Rája, son deva, Maharaja, son of
of preceding.-A.D. preceding.-A.D. 754.
751 (P) and 759. In the Lichchhavi family, the earliest they probably belonged both to one branch name for which we have as yet a definite of the family; though, from their not being date, is that of Sivadêva I., A.D. 637-38. And mentioned in inscription O., certainly not either Sivavsiddhivarman, No. 14 in the to the same branch with Vasantadóva and his Varisávali list of the Sûryavamisi family, or ancestors. Their contemporaries of the ThiSivavavarman, No. 16 in the same, seems to kuri family were respectively Amsuvarman and be intended for him. The next name is that Jishnugupta.-They were followed by another of Dhruvad éva, A.D. 654-55, who is branch of the same family introduced (about not given or represented in the Varhsávali. A.D. 630-655, not A.D. 260) by V ishaThe connection between Sivadêva I. and dêva, who was the contemporary of Sivadêva Dhruvadêya is not as yet explained. But I., and represented, as far as definite dates yo,
" ante, Vol. XIII. p. 427f.
