Book Title: Sambodhi 1974 Vol 03
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 139
________________ A Modern Understanding. of I, ie, purely subject, only symbolically spoken of as objects, That extia bodily things, just in so far as they are mune and not I, are independent need not, however, mean that they are as independent as a pan objectivist would have them From the humanistic point of view they too are symbolic 1epresentations of pure subjectivity Only, the mental and the bodily constitute one type of symbolic representation and the independent thing acother To this distinction we shall very soon turn 19 Most people get upset when their bank balance, very definitely mine to everyone of them, fails Put some people there always are who, not necessarily of defective constitution, bear the loss quietly To bear the loss that way means they can stand aside, they can dissociate themselves, from the things they call mine The same is true of physical injury and mental unhappiness Most people identify themselves with their bodies and minds, so much so that they get puiturbed when these are threatened. But there are some, again, who can calmly bear physical pain and some mental discomfort too They are not necessarily of defective sensibility: it is not true that they do not have these pains and discomforts. They do have these and yet they can stand aside, i. e dissociate themselves from these To have these pains and discomforts means that so far they identify themselves with them, and to bear them calmly means that they so far dissociate themselves from them Simultaneous presence of identification and dissociation is no anomaly here The relation is precisely like one between distinguished form and the given complex from out of which the form is distinguished We have already seen that when the form is distinguished out what remains over is not a distinct matter. What remains over is the same old homogeneous fusion that was started with Similarly, when these people distinguish themselves, say, from mental states, they do indeed realize themselves as centres of pure subjectivity, and yet, at the same time, what remain over are the same old mental states exactly as they were experienced before the dissociation If there was no contradic

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397