Book Title: Sambodhi 1974 Vol 03
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 317
________________ A Modern Understanding of.. The real situation here is, as we have repeatedly shown, that mental states (particularly those which are mistakenly called knowledge) are only a kind of phosphorescent objects wih which pure subjectivity is found, on reflection (ic. in introspection), to have been directly fused and from which, in introspection, it is straightaway distinguished out. Considered from the point of view of pure subjectivity, they constitute the first fused stage, and that is why every mental state is discovered, in introspection, as with pure subjectivity emerging and yet as an object and, therefore, also as a mode of reference, reference being only another name for subjectivity and object alternating indeterminately. The controversy as to whether mental states should or should not be called knowledge (or modes of consciousness) is not one of mere use of language The linguistic problem is undoubtedly there, but what more is there--and that is the real intention of the Indian tianscendentalists-is whether or not there is pure subjectivity behind mental states and what relation it bears to them. The other group of thinkers (suggested in p. 20 ) who recognise a substantive self behind mental states have taken it as itself something with an intrinsic nature of its own and with consciousness as an additional contingent character. The Nyāya-Vaisesika thinker and the Rāmãoujist are the best exponents of this view. The former has openly admitted that all conscious states (with him there is no single consciousness as such except as an abstract universal, adjectival to every conscious state) are contingent, each of them occasioned at a particular point of time and enduring for a limited period * For him, therefore, the substance called self is intrinsically 7 Not in unreflective experience where it stands as an object, though dissociated from some other object or objects 8 When we are speaking of Indian transcedentalists, obviously we are excluding the Buddhists 9 With further details of this limited period we need not be concern. ed here.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397