Book Title: Sambodhi 1974 Vol 03
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 310
________________ 16 Kalidas Bhattacarya itself to be, so far, ie as what it ought to be, is he-ness. not this or that he but what could instantiate itself as any he whatsoever. Further, as here there is no room for abstract universal which is always adjectival, this he ness is a universal substantive, and he as a universal substantive is but pure consciousness as absolute It follows that as soon as I comes to be aware of itself as pure individual subjectivity (liya sāksın) it is aware of itself as what also ought to be pure consciousness as absolute, as Brahman This is the import of the mahāyākya. Tat tvam ast' ('That thou art) - 'tat' standing for possible he and 'tvam' for how 1 is understood from the point of view of a possible listener The whole statement Tat tvam usi' intends that tvam (I understood as a possible you) is really (1.e as what is ought to be) a possible he, ie the absolute, tvam shedding its tyam-ness, though retaining the core-character which is puic consciousness, and tat shedding its possibleness and yet retaining, similarly, its core-character of pure consciousness. At the jīva-säksin stage this absolute identification is felt as what ought to be. This ought-to-be character is understood as realizable in actuality either as many Advaitios bold, through listening to the mahāvākya Tat tvam ası' or, as others appear to hold, through one's own further effort of concentration 11 on this mahāvākya. Be it noted here that though the jiva-sākşin has withdrawn himself from his body and mind this withdrawal is no physical separation yet, and, therefore, listening or concen tration is not out of court at this stage The jīva-sākşın is jīvanmukta, retaining the mind-body complex and, through that, the world of objects, but not being in any way committed to it, being communicu io valy uuu chung, Viz. itself as pure subjectivity This non-commital reteation of everything else is only another name of symbolically constructing it. This is not, of course, the whole story of jīvanmuktı for the account given here is true equally of videhamukti. The 11 Or, if one likes, negative attention.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397