Book Title: Sambodhi 1974 Vol 03
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 138
________________ 18 Kalidas Bhattacharya novel entity involving, quite unlike other things of the world a novel feature, called freedom or dissociation from all that is object, and understanding everything that is appaiently objective as only a symbolic representation of subjectivity that way, the Advaitin concludes that pure subjectivity = pure consciousness is not merely the final essence of the genuine reality, the abiding entity bebind-all that is mental and bodily, it is equally the truth of everything of the world. That introspection = pure subjectivity is the final essence of all that is mental and bodily is evident from another simpler consideration. Extra-bodily things can at most be inine, none of them, singly or together, are ever felt as I Body and its states, on the other hand, and whatever more dissociate than these are called mental-the mind and its states—are as inuch mme as also felt as I. or these two, again-mineness and I ness--I-ness is felt to be more genuine than mineness from the subjective point of view. the mineness of body and mind is related to their I-ness exactly as the in-itself-ness of an extrabodily thing is related to its mineness As between body (and its states) and mind, again, there is undisputed prefer - ence for I ness in the case of mind somehow the mental is experienced as more of the nature of I than the bodily. As for 1 itself, it is never experienced as mine but only as I, the expression 'my selt' being understood exactly in the way the expression its identity' is understood where the identity is not different from the 'It' except verbally Of mine' and I', now, the latter is niore original and the former derived from it-anything is mine only in so far as it is related to I It follows that where something is spoken of as both ‘T and *mine, it is more I than mine As extra bodily things are never spoken of as I they are not of the nature of 1, though as related to I they may well be mine So far they are independent of I But not so one's body and mind and their states. As both mine and I, they are oniginally of the nature

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397