Book Title: Samayasara
Author(s): A Chakravarti
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 201
________________ CHAPTER III 73 produces the various modifications of Karmas out of the available material atoms. Having produced the Karmir modification in the matter, the hedonic consequences of these Karmic materials are enjoyed by the Self as Bhokla. Thus the relationship to Karmic materials of Karta and Bhokia, the Agent and the Enjoyer, which was denied of the Self from the real point of view, is reasserted from the vyavahāra point of view, Next the author refutes dvikriyavada, the doctrine that the same cause can produce two distinct effects, जदि पोग्गलकम्ममिणं कुम्वदि तं चेव वेदयदि आदा । दोकिरियावादित्तं पसजदि सो जिणावमदं ॥८॥ jadi poggalakammamiņai kuvvadi tai ceva vedayadi ada dokiriyavādittain pasajadi so jiņāvamadain (85) यदि पुदगलकर्मेदं करोति तच्चैव वेदयते आत्मा । द्विक्रियावादित्वं प्रसनति तत् स निनावमतम् ॥८५॥ 85. If the Atma or Self produces these Karmic materials (operating as upadāna karta or substantive cause) and enjoys the consequer.ces thereof in the same manner, it will lead to the doctrine of a single cause producing two different effects, which will be in conflict with the Jaina faith. COMMENTARY If what is taken to be true from the vyavahāra point of view, that the Atma is the agent and enjoyer of his own karmas, is also taken to be true from the absolute point of view, it will lead to a metaphysical error. Atmā is a celana dravya or thinking substance, karma-pudgala, karmic materials, are as acetana dravya, -- -non-thinking substance. The Jaina faith is distinctly a dualistic one. Jiva and pudgala, thinking thing and non-thinking thing, are entirely distinct from each other, intransmutable one to the other and completely self-subsistent. If the Self, as an agent, is capable of producing modification not only in himself but also in Karmic materials, operating identically in the same manner as upādāna kartā, then this causal agent must be credited with a potency to produce entirely two different effects and this doctrine of causation is what is called dvikriyāvāda—the doctrine which is rejected by the Jaina philosophy. According to Jaina metaphysics, two distinct and conflicting effects cannot be 10 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370