Book Title: Sramana 2007 10
Author(s): Shreeprakash Pandey, Vijay Kumar
Publisher: Parshvanath Vidhyashram Varanasi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 94
________________ The Concept of Mind (Manas) in Jaina Philosophy : 89 the intellect directly without any intermediate agency of the senses. In the apprehension of the sense objects there is likewise participation by the intellect; but these dharmas are non-sensuous objects, they are the exclusive domains of respective intellect, just as color is the exclusive domain of the sense of vision. The Buddhist does not regard the soul as different from mind. Jaina Concept of Mind The Jaina concept of mind is different from that of the other schools of Indian philosophy, as it does not consider mind as one of the sense organ. They maintain that mind is a particular material substance. It is considered as the organ of apprehension of all subjects of all the senses?'. It is also designated as anindriya or no-indriya i.e. quasi-sense, subtle sense (sūkşma-indriya) or inner sense (antahkarana). It seems that when the problem whether mind should be designated as a sense-organ presented it before the non-Buddhist thinkers, they tried to clarify their position by deducting its status of a sense-organ from the implication of their own ancient text. The Jainas, however, adhered to their old position of regarding mind as anindriya. Thus whereas Vātsyāyana referred to other schools (tantrântara) and Sankarācārya to some smrti-text, the Jaina thinkers thought it proper to admit it as an anindriya. The antiquity of this Jaina conception depends upon the antiquity of their conception of twenty-eight types of abhinibothika-jñāna (perceptual cognition) which includes no-indriya avagraha (quasi-sensuous indeterminate perception), no-indriya ihā (quasi-sensuous speculation) etc. Perhaps the Jaina concept of mind as a quasi-sense is as old as the Buddhist conception of mind. Now a question arises as to why the different schools took so much pain to win the title of a sense-organ for mind, while the Jainas did not care for it. The non-Jaina schools unanimously agreed that the knowledge born of the contact of the sense-organs with the object is pratyaksa (direct cognition). When the problem regarding feelings of pain and pleasure etc. which are obviously independent from the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230