________________
Vol. XIX, 1994-1995
VISVANATHA'S...
41
S.D. is clearly mentioned by name in K.P.D. at seven places, where we get quotations from S.D., while at three places we have quotations from S.D. without any clear mentioning.
1. K.P.D. Ullāsa IX
2.
TUKANG GAWNT
5.
6.
7.
8.
Over and above this, S.D. is mentioned in name at three places, from which one is cited in our discussion. The other two places, which are left out by us are as under :
9.
10.
11.
-
p. 133 on K.P. IX. 85
K.P.D. Ullasa IX - p. 134 on K.P. IX. 85
It may also be noted that at times the K.P.D. quotes particular illustrations fully, which are also read in the S.D. They are as under :
....
....K.P.D. VIII p.117 :... K.P.D. VIII p.117 ....K.P.D. VIII p.117 ....K.P.D. VIII p.118 erface...K.P.D. VIII p.119 दष्टवैकासनसंस्थिते K.P.D. VIII p. 119
af... K.P.D. X. P.148 S.D. X p.550. कटाक्षेणापी K.P.D. X. p. 165 S.D. X. p.631. .... K.P.D. X. p.144 S.D. X. p. 564. का विसमा K.P.D. X p.157 S.D. X p.604. .... K.P.D. X p. 165 S.D. X. p. 632.
S.D. VIII pp. 457-58. S.D. VI p. 311. S.D. III p.136.
S.D. III p.110. S.D. X pp.615-16.
S.D. IIIp.115 & VIII p.463.
Thus in this second article, which follows our first one read at the 32nd session, A.I.O.C., at Ahmedabad, we have tried to point out the parallasisms between the K.P.D. and the S.D. We can not help suggesting that the Allahabad edition of the K.P.D. has left out much to be desired and a Critical Edition of the K.P.D. has to be attempted afresh. Our comparision of both the texts has shown that it can be helpful in editing the K.P.D. and fill up the gaps which the learned editor has left out.
Published in "Sambodhi", Vol.12 April'83 and Jan.'84 a research. journal of L.D. Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad.
