Book Title: Risht Samucchaya Author(s): Durgadevacharya, A S Gopani Publisher: Bharatiya Vidya BhavanPage 47
________________ THE RIŞTASAMUCCAYA on the allied subjects. Durgadeva calls himself the pupil of Samyamadeva, who was the pupil of Samyamasena whose guru was Mādhavacandra. Durgadeva undertook the composition of the RS in pursuance of the directions received from Samyamas deva. (ü) KUMBHANAGARANAGAKA AND LAKSMĪNIVĀSA: Durgadeva had finished this epitome at Kumbhanagaranaga ruled over by Lakşminivāsa, in a fine temple of śāntinātha, on the eleventh of the bright half of Srāvaņa when the moon was in the constellation 10 called Mūla, in the year 1089.3 My suggestion that Kumbhanagara cannot be anything but Kumher or Kumbher or Kumbheri near Bharatpur has been supported in clear terms by Mm. Dr. G.H. OJHA who further adds that Lakşmīnivāsa referred to in the text may be an ordinary chieftain and also agrees with me in my is belief that Durgadeva must have written this work in Jaina Saurasenī Prākrit as Kumher or Kumbher or Kumbheri is near the Śūrasena country where there is every possibility of Sauraseni being used“. Kumbhanagaranaga cannot stand for Kumbhala garh as the fortress was built after Durgadeva's times'. Nor can zo it be Kumbhalavihāra founded by Kumbho Rāņā in a fort named Macinda". Thus I firmly hold that Kumbhanagara of the RS is the modern Kumher or Kumbher or Kumbheri' near 1 See st. 254 of the text. 2 See st. 255. 3 See sts. 260 and 261. 4 In his letter of 28th, March, 1941 Mm. Dr. G. H. OJHA, writes to me as follows from Ajmer : "As for the Kumbhanagaranaga, as the book is written in Jaina Sauraseni Prakrit, the name may be identified with Kumbher near Bharatpur as it lies very near the Šūrasena country. As regards the king named Lakşminivāsa, he was probably some petty chief of Kumbhanagaranaga.” 5 The same letter quoted above goes on as under : "I am definite that it does not stand for Kumbhalagarh for this fort was built by Mahārāṇā Kumbha of. Mowār in 1458 A. D. whereas the book was written in the 11th century A. D." 6 JSSI, para 830. 7 See Sambodhaka, pub. Bhaskar Vaman Bilat, Dhulia, Vol. 12, No. 1; p. 103. In the Notes, p. 94, Vol. 11 is a misprint for Vol. 12, No. 1. This Kumbher is a headquarter of a Tahsil of the same name in the state of Bharatpur which is divided into two districts or Nizāmats, namely, Bharatpur and Dig. The Dig district has got five Tahsils, such as, Dig, Kāman, Kumbher, Nagar and Pahāri. Kumbher is about eleven miles away north-west of Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290