Book Title: Nyaya Theory of Knowledge
Author(s): S C Chateerjee
Publisher: University of Calcutta

Previous | Next

Page 219
________________ 200 NYAYA TABORY OF KNOWLEDGE mental effort or volition. To these we may add the universal of each of these attributes, their non-existence and inherence in the self, and the self itself? All of these are perceived when there is contact (sannikarşa), in some form or other, between them and the internal sense of manas Let us now consider the process involved in the perception of these objeets. According to the Nyāya, pleasure and pain, desire and aversion, cognition and volition are attributes of the self. Their relation to the self is one of inherence (samavāya). They are perceived when the mind as a sense comes in contact with them. This sense-object contact is not one of direct conjunction (saryoga). It is an indirect contact called samyukta-samavāya. Pleasure, pain and the rest as particular fuets, co:ne in contact with the mind through their 10 herence (samavāya) in the self which is conjoined (samyukta) with the mind. Similarly, the universals of pleasure, pain, etc., are perceived through that kind of indirect sense-contact which is called samyukta-samavetasamaviya. The universals of pleasure and pain (sukhatvaduḥkhatva) subsist in particular pleasures and pains by way of inherence (samkvāya). The particular pleasures and pains exist in the soul as its inherent attributes (şamavelaguņāh). Hence the mind comes in contact with the universals of pleasure and pain through their inherence in what inhere in the soul which is conjoined to the mind. In perceiving any particular pleasure or pain we do perceive its pleasurableness or painfulness quite as directly, although the process of perception is more mediated and complicated.' So also, we perceive that pleasure, pain, etc , inhere in the self so long as they exist or are present. And just as we perceive their existence so also we perceive their non-exist 1 Mapograbya sukharh dohkhamiochi dvoro matih kftih, BP., 87, 1 TK., p. 9. I Vide SM , 57 : TB., p. 6.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440