Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 52
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 149
________________ June, 1923 ] SOME DISCURSIVE COMMENTS ON BARBOSA 133 Barbosa then passes up the East Coast to Paleacatte (Pulicat) and thence to Orissa, or as he calls it Otisa, a neat reference to the vernacular name, which is Odisa or Orisā, showing the two native pronunciations of the palatal (cerebral) sonant as d or r. Pulicat then belonged to Vijayanagar (Bisnaga), and that realm and Orissa were divided by the Udaya. giri hills, which name I suggest is at the root of Barbosa's " mountains called Odirguamalado," i.e., Udayagiri-malai, which may be translated "the Udaya mountain range," giri and malai both meaning "hill ” in different vernaculars. In the course of his very valuable note on Pulicat, Dames refers to Fitch's Servidore, whatever may be the modern name " of that place (p. 131). It was on "the old trade route leading from the East Coast to Western India.” I am tempted to suggest that Servidore represents Srivattûr, for Tiruvattiyûr, i.e., Trivetore in the Chingleput District. There is another Trivetore, viz., Tiruvattur in the North Arcot District. Mr. W. Foster, Early Travels in India, p. 16 n., is, however, of opinion that "Servidore" is "a confused form of Bidar, the capital, situated about 70 miles N. W. of Goloonda." There is much to be said for this view. But surely Dames writes in error when he observes that Malayalam is an Aryan language. In the account of Orissa the most interesting point to note is that Barbosa says that it was bounded on the North by "a river called Ganges, but they call it Guorigua," meaning thereby that the boundary river was a ganga or sacred river, viz., the Baitarani. For Guori. gua Dames has one of his happy suggestions, viz., that it is a mistranscription of the MS. and should be read Guangua, i.e., Ganga. Barbosa then goes on to "Bengala ” which induces Dames to plunge into the old controversy as to the identity of the "City of Bengala "at great length and with much acumen. After adverting to the known identifications available to him and his correspondents, he finally arrives at the conclusion that by that name the Portuguese and other early writers meant Gaur, taken together with its ports Satgaon and Sunârgaon, and not Dacca. Even now, however, this matter is not at rest, as Mr. Heawood has shown in the Geographical Journal for October 1921, where he inclines to the view held by Yule that the City of Bengala” was Chittagong. I cannot go into the question fully here, but as it has long attracted the attention of Bengali antiquaries themselves, I have been in communication with them, and hope some day to produce their views and arguments for the benefit of Indian enquirers generally. So far as I understand them, their views tend to identify the "City of Bengala” with one of the old ports in Eastern Bengal, notably Sunargaon. While I am on this point I may as well mention that Barbosa refers also to another long discussed geographical point, Lake Chimay or Chiamay, generally held to be mythical. Pinto is one of the chief sources of information, and my experience of him is that the more one knows of the country he happens to be talking about, the more one realises that he is not the liar he has so long been represented to be. No doubt many fanciful tales have been told about a great interior lake, which was called by the early travellers and map-makers, Chimay, or something like it. There is a good deal of confusion as to what the term Chimay, Chiamay represented, as it is applied to a State, a town, a river and a lake. It may well have represented them all, and if so, the State of Chiengmai on the Burmo-Siamese border, the Zimme of the Burmese, at once suggests itself, but whether Zimme is actually represented by the term is too complicated a question for me to enter into here. My main object in alluding to it now is to suggest that for the purpose of useful research, it would be as well to assume that Chimay is the name of some place really in existence, and no myth. Chimay has been given a possible location for Barbosa's Gueos, a tribe that is still a puzzle to enquirers, despite Dames' identification with the Was, on the authority of Sir George .

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568