Book Title: New Dimensions in Jaina Logic
Author(s): Mahaprajna Acharya, Nathmal Tatia
Publisher: Today and Tommorrow Printers and Publishers

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 69
________________ Doctrine of Navas 61 The expressions 'mortal' and 'man' are synonymous, but they represent different modes of the same entity, and as such they do not have an identical referent as explained below: (a) A man is mortal and, therefore, he is represented by the term 'morial'. The expression 'mortal' expresses the mortality-aspect of a man. (b) A man is so called because he is the descendant of Manu. The word has a reference to his descent from a certain person, named Manu. Similarly in the propositions (a) it is the current of Bhagirathi and (b) it is the current of Haimavati, the expressions 'Bhagirathi and 'Haimavati' refer to the selfsame Ganges, but stress WO different modes that have reference to the origin of the river. The first term refers to the myth of Bhagiratha digging up the bodofile Ganges, whereas the second expression refers to the physicairgin of the Ganges from the Himalayas. The Viewpoint of Function (evambhūta nya) In this viewpoint the relationship between the dermatove and the denotatum is further delimited in that the etyinological meaning of the former must be satisfied by the latter A wat in order 10 ks an exact denotative of the sense must hater to the present me: instead of a bygone aspect or an aspect that is to come. In the interest of precision of expression one should use only the word that is indicative of immediately cring mode of the denotartani In the proposition 'a teacher is teaching the student', ihe expression "teacher' has been properly used because he is engaged in the act of teaching at the moment. But in the proposition 'a teacher is takim his lunch', the use of the word 'teacher' is not logically prop because he is taking food instead of doing any koud ot cache the moment. The Scope of Viewpoints The substance stands for the universal refer to the particular aspects of a thing. Saba n es are indeed the basic objects of cognition. In liewpoints have been conceived on the basis of the areal (a) The cognition or the experience stosice e' the univer sal of a thing is the source of it is known as the subsiantial viewpoint (dravyärthika nayu) (b) The mode or the particular in a thing is responsible for what is called the moslal viewpoint (paryayarthika naya). Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206