Book Title: New Dimensions in Jaina Logic
Author(s): Mahaprajna Acharya, Nathmal Tatia
Publisher: Today and Tommorrow Printers and Publishers

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 81
________________ Conditional Dialectics 73 define the nature of the real. This can be demonstrated by the doctrine of sevenfold predication (saptabhangi) which is as follows: 1. The pot certainly (eva) exists in some respect (syāt). 2. The pot certainly (eva) does not exist in some respect (syāt). 3. The pot certainly (eva) exists and does not exist in some respect (syāt). 4. The pot is certainly (eva) indescribable in some respect (syat). 5. The pot certainly (eva) exists and is indescribable in some respect (svāt). 6. The pot certainly (eva) does not exist and is indescribable in some respect (syät). 7. The pot certainly (eva) exists, certainly does not exist and is indescribable in some respect (syāt). It represents the existence of the pot, relegating the other attributes to a secondary position by excluding them from the intended area of reference. The expression 'eva' (certainly) in the above propositions indicates the definite character of the assertion or the negation or indescribability or their possible combinations. Sometimes it is suggested that the expression 'also' (api) should be substituted for the expression 'certainly' (eva) in the above propositions. But such substitution would not carry much meaning. Without the use of the expression 'certainly' (eva) the intended attributes (existence, nonexistence etc.) would not be definitely determined. In the absence of relativism indicated by the phrase 'in some respect' (syat) the use of the expression 'certainly' (eva) would confer an absolutistic import on the propositions. But by the use of the word 'syat' (in some respect) indicative of relativism, the expression certainly (eva) loses the absolutistic import and confers definiteness on the intended attributes predicated in the propositions. The expression 'eva' (exclusively) is used to serve three purposes 1. The exclusion of non-relationship. (ayogavyavaccheda) 2. The exclusion of the relationship with others (anyayogavyavaccheda). 3. The exclusion of absolute non-relationship (atyantayogavyavaccheda). In the proposition 'the conch is white exclusively' there is the exclusion of non-relationship. The expression 'eva' (exclusively) is attached to the adjective for excluding the doubt about the existence of the adjective. When the whiteness of the conch is under query, the assertion is made that the conch is white exclusively. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206