Book Title: Jaina Epistemology
Author(s): Indra Chandra Shastri
Publisher: Parshwanath Vidyapith

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 200
________________ The Gen, ral Conception of Knowledge 175 mination as an individual factor related with the subject only Kundah unda's View Explained Kundakunda maintains that whatever knows the object, is knowledge. It modifies itself and all the objects stand in knowledge. The two commentators, Amộtacandra and Jayasena take different courses to explain it. Amộtacandra takes the position of Sautrāntika and holds that knowledge takes the form of object. This change in form is caused by the object; and consequently the latter stands in knowledge. Standing in know edge according to this interpretation is to be reflected in knowledge. But this view goes against the Jaina position in two ways, Firstly, the Jainas do not admit the knowledge as taking the form of object. The Jaina logician have criticised the Sautrāntika bitterly, on this very issue, Jñeyā kāra, as we have already stated, is not a mode of jñāna but, the state of being qualified. Secondly, the Jaina does not admit object as the cause of knowledge, to which the above interpretation naturally leads. Jayasena's interpretation is more logical. He holds that the statement that all bjects stand in knowledge should not be taken in literal sense. It is only an allegorical statement just as we say that mirror contains the jar. As a matter of fact the mirror does not hold the jar but, only gets its reflection. Similarly, the object does not stand in knowledge. It is only manifested in it. He only means that a cognition never appears without having an object as its data'ım. Whenever there is a cognition it must be associated with some object. Thus, an object in the form of datum must stand in knowledge. It does not mean that Kundakunda is in favour of the theory of representation. This confusion rises from the Jayasena's simile of mirror. Bat, we should note that Jayasena writes "ādarśa bimbamiva" and not "pratibimbamiva'. He does not say that the object stands in knowledge just like the reflection of an object. He says that the object itself stands in the mirror. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516