Book Title: Jaina Epistemology
Author(s): Indra Chandra Shastri
Publisher: Parshwanath Vidyapith

Previous | Next

Page 332
________________ Indirect Knowledge 307 inarticulate. In the latter stages the cognizer must have articulate cognition. It can be argued that avagraha etc. are recognized as the stages of śruta-piśrita-mati, so the function of articulation, in the latter stages can be performed by śruta. This view also is not free from defects. If the function of ībā is performed by śruta the former cannot be a stage of mati. If, in spite of its being the function of śruta Ibā is admitted as the stage of mati śruta will have no scope. The alternative that both mati as well śruta should be accepted to exist there, also is not feasible; because, two upayogas do not occur simultaneously. Moreover, śruta-nisrita does not mean articulation or dependence upon śruta at the time of occurrence. It only means the relation with a person whose mind is will-cultivated through the knowledge of scriptures or other instructions. As a matter of fact, bhāvaśruta and mati both are articulate as well as inarticulate. Mati in the stage of avagraha is inarticulate and in the latter stages articulate. Śruta is articulate as far as it follows the scriptures or articulate speech. It is inarticulate when it follows a sound other than books or distinct speech : just as the sound of inhaling or exhaling, spitting, coughing etc. But, in the case of dravyaśruta it is positively articulate. Inarticulate sound is not accepted as dravyasruta. So, the difference of articulation and inarticulation is applicable to dravyaśruta and mati only. The difference between the two based on Silence and Eloquency Śruta is eloquent. It can express the object to others. Mati is silent. It cannot make the object known to others. It can be said, as far as cognition is concerned mati and śruta, both are silent. It is only speech, recognized as dravyaśruta, that can express the meaning to others. It is related with bhāvaśruta; because, it is a cause of the latter. If bhāvaśruta is he.d as eloquent on account of the expressiveness of its cause, the mati also can be proved eloquent on the same basis. The object of mati is not expressed through words, but the same can be done 1. Viśeşāvaśyakabhāsya G. 171-176 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516