Book Title: Jaina Epistemology
Author(s): Indra Chandra Shastri
Publisher: Parshwanath Vidyapith

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 444
________________ Direct Knowledge 419 When the complete wall is removed the certain rays coming through the hole amalgamate in the full gloom. 3. Yasovijaya explains the same in different manner. He compares kevalajñānāvarana with the clouds obscuring the sun. Though the cloud enshrouds the light of the sun; yet its obscurance is not very thick. It is not so strong as to wipe out the difference between day and night. But, that dim light also can be further obscured by wall etc. The āvaraņas of mati etc. are compared with this obscurance. At the time of kevala the obscurance of both the types is destroyed. This also means a sort of merger into the complete knowledge. But, Yasovijaya introduces a new theory. He says that kevalajñānāvarana has two functions. On one hand it obscures the keyalajñāna; on other hand, it produces the incomplete knowledge, which is further obscured by the other types of avarana. When the kevalajñānāvarana is removed the question of the existence of incomplete knowledge does not arise. It is evident that Yaśovijaya is clearly influenced by the Vedantic conception of the two functions of avidyā. An āvarana can conceal the light as well as blur the vision so that the object appears as disfigured, as in the case of whirling stick lighted at the ends (ālātacakra) or the appearance of two moons. But, where the knowledge is correct, whether partial or complete, it cannot be produced by āvaraña. The Vedantic conception of viksepaśakti can be justified on the ground that the appearance of external objects is false. It must have some defect in the cause. But, the Jainas do not hold the appearance of external objects as false. It is as true as the cognition produced by kevala. The difference lies in quantity and not in quality. Kevalajñāna and its āvarana are opposed to each other. The latter cannot produce kevalajñāna. In the same way it cannot produce any other knowledge which holds the same nature as kevala. 4. Kundakunda proposes a fundamental difference between the two types of knowledge. He says that kevala is natural (svabbāva) while the other types are extra-natural (vibhāva)2. 1. Pravacanasāra. 1/47-49 & 58. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516