________________
Vol. XXI, 1997
KUMĀRASAMBHAVA AS CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY....
पौनरुक्त्य.
(26) FYg à 4-497. (Ku. Saṁ.3/21). Vy.V.II :In the RICERUT of game, this verse is quoted by M. The sequence intended here is : "Inspire the fire". So, whatever is connected with whichever becomes related even by repetition. "3716f" has no value so far as 374461 (noncompounded) words are used". This statement is blurted out without considering the merits of the apprehensions derived from the use of uncompounded words placed closer or otherwise. So, " fred Ruta Efaeftatur afa" is the correct reading acc. to M.
(27) FEET (Ku. Sam. 8/57); Vy.V.II :The sixth fault of word, viz. 270124CF is explained with the help of this verse. Here darkness is the matter in hand. By simply stating that only by itself the importance of 3746459 - (unpious people) is not possible to be understood, so it has to be stated separately. So, there is no 3791 here.
(28) #Ci 7471:. (Ku. Sam. 4/23). Vy.V.II :
While explaining 37910499741o this verse is cited. It is an illustration of Fayralfas figure. (29) Be aasta. (Ku. Sam. 3/20). Vy.V.III :Freiras and 344 ls are taken up in this chapter by M. Some Frutas suggest various feeling. By 3TET 6-, / anger is suggested here; that your ability is boundless. By E feah, sorrow and by where shall I go', 'soka is suggested. So, there should not be tofonata when two, three or more fruids are used at a time.
We have seen that M. has gone for very subtle and in-depth text-based criticism of different verses from Ku. Sam. and has tried to establish the 3fafara.
VI : Rājasekhara (=R.) in his Kävyamīmāṁsā (=K.M.) takes up seven verses for the Ku. Sam. as below :(1) BryteiKu. Sam. 1/1). K.M.ch.17 :While discussing arrangfara this verse is quoted by R. to illustrate the northen direction. (2) #747. (Ku. Sam. 3/72). K.M.ch.9 :
In ch.9., while taking note of the opinion of Avantīsundarī that a matter can
