Book Title: Concept of Matter in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): J C Sikdar
Publisher: P V Research Institute Varanasi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 146
________________ Atomism 111 place samyoga (conjunction) of atoms because of their being devoid of parts. But after having been combined, their conjunction takes place. Vasubandhu opines that it should be asked from them whether samghātaparamāņu (combined atom) is rather another entity than these atoms. If there loes not take place the conjunction of these atoms, then whose conjunction occurs in combination ? Again, a mutual conjunction of samghātaparamāņus (combined atoms) also does not come about. It should not be said that a conjunction is not proved due to the cause of partlessness of atoms, for there does not take place also a conjunction of Sāvayava samghāta (combination with parts). Therefore, atoms are not one single substance whether a conjunction of atoms be ista (desired) or not. The oneness (ekatva) of that whose digbhāgabheda (division of parts of direction) is admitted is untenable. Atom has got other sides (parts) of eastern direction, of downward direction, etc. In this way, there is digbhāgabheda; then how will the oneness of tadātmakaparamāņu (identical atom) be reasonable? And if digbhāgabheda is not admitted, how will there be impenetrability of atom? How will there be combination ? On the rise of the sun, how do there take place (fall) the shadow somewhere and the sunshine elsewhere? If other parts are not existing, there is no sunshine. If digbhāgabheda is not desirable, then how does there occur the covering of one atom by another one ? But an atom has no parabhaga (external or outside part) where there takes place the resistance or repulsion (pratighāta) of one atom by another due to the coming into contact and if the resistance or repulsion does not happen, there will be equal spaceness (ākāśatva) of all atoms and all combinations will become only atom, not molecule. If it forms the lump (pinda), then the lump is not anything else than the atoms or is other than it (atom). If the lump is not accepted as different from atoms, then it is proved that they are not of the lump. This idea is imaginary. If atom is sarghāta (combined) or pinda (lump), then what is good by holding this view, if there is no denial of the characteristics--rūpa, etc. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412