Book Title: Canonical Niksepa Author(s): Bansidhar Bhatt Publisher: Bharatiya Vidya PrakashanPage 85
________________ 60 THE CANONICAL NIKSEPA sa-pajjavasie ceva, a-pajjavasie ceva). 1021 his specimen contains the elements "duviha", "pannatta", "tam jahā", and it is at the same time a good example of simple ramification. It was taken from Sthana, i.e. from a work which does not show the question-cum-answer ("dialogue") pattern. Specimens introduced by a question, as they are found in Bhagavatī, Jīvābhigama, and Prajñāpanā, tend to be more complex. We quote Prajñāpanā 12.405-406 (S.II, p.405): "kai ņam, bhante, sarīrā pannattā?" "Goyanā, pañca sarīrā pannattā, tam jahā: orālie, veuvvie, āhārae, teyae, kammae." ------ "neraiyānam, bhante, kai Sariraya pannattā?" "Goyamā, tao sarirayā pannattā, tam jahā: veuvvie, teyae, kanmae." evam asurakumarāna vi jāva thaniyakumaranam. "pudhavi-kāiyānam, bhante, kai sarirayā pannattā?" "Goyamā, tao sarirayā pannattă, tam jahā: orālie, teyae, kammae." evam vāu-kaiya-vajjam jāva caur'-indiyānam. "vāu-kāiyāṇam, bhante, kai sarirayā pannattā?" "Goyamā, cattāri sarirayā pannattă, tam jahā: orālie, veuvvie, teyae, kannae." evam pañc' -indiya-tirikkha-joniyāna vi. "maņussăņam, bhante, kai sarirayā pannattā?" "Goyamā, pañca sarīrayā pannattā, tam jahā: opätie, veuvvie, āhārae, teyae, kammae." vāṇamantara-joisiya-vemāniyānam jahā nāragānam. | 405-406 1 In the Āmukha style (as elsewhere), isomorphous passages may show minor phraseological differences which are in many cases - though not always - coincidental. The five sūt ras Sthāna 6.548-52 (S.I, p.270) are a case in point. They show the following beginnings with different formulas for "six": - 6.548: 6.549: chaj-jīvanikāyā pa (nnattā), tam (jahā): ...... cha tāra-ggahā pa (nnattā), tam (jahā): ...... chavvihā samsāra-samāvannagā jīvā pa (nnattā), tam (jahā): ...... pudhavi-kāiya cha-gaiyā, cha-āgaiyā pa(nnattā), tam (jahā): ...... chavvihā savva-jīvā pannattā), tam (jahā): ...... 6.551: 6.552: The single phrase "tattha nam je te" (mentioned above) may be demonstrated by the sutra Prajnāpana 17.1.478 (S.II, P.435): "neraiyā nam, bhante, savve sama-veyaņā?" "Goyamā, no in' atthe samatthe." "se ken atthenam, bhante, evam vuccai: neraiyā no savve sama-veyaņā?" "Goyama, neraiya duvihā pannattā, tam jahā: samni-bhūyā ya a-samni-bhūyā ya. tattha nam je te samnibhūyā, te nam mahā-veyanatarāgā. tattha nam je te a-samni-bhūyā, te nam appa-veyaņatarāgā. se ten' atthenam, Goyanā, evam vuccai: neraiyā no savve sana-veyaņā." | 478 In connection with the Āmukha style we can quote from the Abhidhamma the following passage (Vibhanga 17.4.80): tattha katamāni tīņi bhayāni? jāti-bhayam, jarā-bhayam, marana-bhayam. ------ tatthaPage Navigation
1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192