Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 50
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 206
________________ 196 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JUNE, 19 1 Murtaza Nizâm Shâh in his youth avoided all business of state and gave himself up wholly to sensual pleasures, so that the business of the state fell upon the shoulders of his mother Khânzâdah Humâyûn, who was the mother both of Murtaza Nizam Shâh and of his present majesty, Burhân Nizâm Shah Sahib Qirán, and the nobles and officers of state obeyed her in all things as though she had been king. She managed all affairs, whether of war or of peace, with wisdom and prudence. At first she confirmed and continued Qâsim Beg Hakim in the office of vakil and pishvâ, which he had held in the reign of the late king, who had left Maulânâ 'Inayatullah in the territories of Vijayanagar with an army in order that he might capture the fortresses of Raichur and Mudgal, but afterwards when Maulânâ 'Inayatullah returned from Vijayanagar, Qasim Beg, who was growing feeble with age, resigned his office and went into retirement in his house, while 'Inayatullah was appointed vakil and pished in his place. Then Farhad Khân the African, who had formerly been one of Qasim Beg's slaves, and, having been patronized by the king, had become a vazir and an officer in the army, and had then, owing to a quarrel between himself and Chatâ Khân the eunuch, become apprehensive, and had fled with some other vazirs to Gujarât, took Qâsim Beg, who had been sent to allay the fears of Farhâd and his companions, to Gujarât. Qâsim Beg died at the port of Surat. After a while Farhâd Khân, having received a safe conduct, returned to Ahmadnagar and re-entered the royal service, and Maulânâ 'Inayatullah, after holding the great offices of vakil and pishvd for some time, resigned them, and returned to the fortress of Lohogarh. Then Sayyid Shâh Rafi'-ud-din Husain, eldest son of the late Shâh Tâhir, was eppointed vakil and pishvá, but was soon dismissed, and was succeeded by Tâj Khân and 'Ain-ul-Mulk, brothers of Khûnzah Humâyûn, who jointly held the offices of vakil and pishvd and usurped their sister's power and position in the state. Seven months after the death of Husain Nizam Shah, on Sunday, Rajab 5, 973 (Jan. 26, 1566), which was the date selected by the astrologers, Murtaza was formally and ceremoniously enthroned and crowned, and the amirs and great officers of state saluted him and scattered largesse. LXXI. AN ACCOUNT OF 'ALI ADIL SHAH'S EXPEDITION AGAINST ARMADNAGAR AND OF ITS RESULTS. When 'Alî 'Adil Shâh heard of the death of Husain Nizâm Shâh and of Murtaza Nizâm Shâh's neglect of public business and devotion to sensual delights, he seized the opportu. nity of violating his treaty and of disregarding his connection by marriage with Murtazâ Nizâm Shâh and, at the instigation of Kishvar Khân, who was then pished of the kingdom of Bijapur, invaded the kingdom of Ahmadnagar with an army of horse and foot.161 When news of the irruption was brought by spies to Khûnzah Humâyûn, she considered that it would be wise to enter into treaties with the neighbouring rulers, and thus form a confederacy too strong for 'Ali 'Adil Shâh. She therefore sent an envoy to Tufâl Khân, who was then de facto ruler of Berar and had imprisoned the 'Imâd Shâhî family, the offspring 161 The treaty referred to was that made after the battle of Tâlikota, but Sayyid 'Ali gives an entirely false idea of the conduct of 'Ali Adil Shah, who was not the aggressor. After the battle of Talikota he took under his protection Timmala, son of Sadashivaraya, established him as ruler of Anagondi, and supported him against his uncle Venkatadri, who retired to Nalgonda. When 'Ali led an army to Anagondi to support Timmala, Venkatadri appealed for help to Ahmadnagar and Khûnzah Humayun and her son invaded 'Ali's dominions and prepared to besiege Bijapûr. Ali hastened lack from Anagondi and after a few indecisive combats the army of Ahmadnagar retired. These events. happened in A.. 973 (A.D. 1565-66)-F. ii. 77, 78, 254. Firishta says nothing of Tufal Khân or Ibrahim Qutb Shah having joined Murtaza Nizam Shah, and it is most improbable that they did so.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468