Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 324
________________ A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY 303 Jinabhadragani Kṣamāśramaņa outlined the metaphysical tradition. According to him, naigama, sangrahe, vyavahāra and ṛjusūtranaya are dravyārthika nayas. While sabda, samabhirūḍha and evambhūta nayas refer to the paryāyas, therefore, they are paryāyārthika nayas. hasena Divākara has given the logical tradition. According to him, the first three nayas are dravyarthika nayas and the remaining are paryāyārthika nayas.1 Sidd The metaphysical tradition considers rjusūtranaya as dravyarthika as it refers to the substance. This view is based on the 14th sutra of the Anuyogadvāra. According to this view, in this with reference to this naya, an individual without the upayoga (harmonic energy) is to be considered as from the point of view of substance as an individual. From the metaphysical point of view, if ṛjusūtranaya is not taken with reference to substance, it will contradict the statement in the Anuyogadvāra. But the logical tradition maintains that the statement in the Anuyogadvāra has reference to the modifications of an object at a particular point of time and reference to substance or object (dravya) is only formal. Therefore, there should be no contradiction in reading the statement of the Anuyogadvāra with reference to the analysis of the modes of a thing. The metaphysical tradition has given importance to the substance (dravya) which is secondary. Therefore, they considered it as dravyārthikanaya. But really speaking, according to the logical tradition, reference to the substance (dravya) is only secondary, while the modes are primary. Therefore, ṛjusūtranaya is primarily paryāyārthika. The metaphysical tradition gives importance to dravya as primary, while the logical tradition looks at it from the point of view of paryaya. These two are only distinctions in the approaches to the problems, but there is fundamental difference in their analysis. One presents the object from the point of view of substance and the other presents the object from the point of view of view of modes. • NAIGAMANAYA L 3 Naigamanaya is the point of view by which the generality and 1 Nyayopadesa 18 2 Anuyogadvāra 14 3 Naya-rahasya, p. 12 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590