Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

Previous | Next

Page 335
________________ 314 A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY burnt. One can easily see that in the process of burning some portion of firewood is burnt, some is burning and still some of it is not burning. Therefore, it is difficult to say that the wood is burning. The wood can be described as burning and as not burning, as burning it is not wood and as wood it is not burning. The rjusūtranaya in its suble form would also maintain that in the act of eating, we are not eating at all. Because the act of eating involves the series of moment, and each moment presents a particular action. When we take food in the hand in a particular moment, it is not eating. Next moment we keep it in the mouth, it is also an act in a particular moment and when we gulp the food it is not eating at all. The rjusūtranaya does not accept the continuum of the actions in different moments. It looks at the object at a particular moment. It is not very much relevant for understanding the nature of the object from the practical point. The comprehension of the nature of objects from the practical point is possible from naigama and vyavahāra nayas. In the rjusūtra naya primary emphasis is given on modifications and that too of the moments, although there is the implicit acceptance of the substance which has modifications. But this is secondary. Rjusūtranya has two forms (1) Sūkşma rjusūtranaya and (2) sthüla rjusūtranaya. The sükşma rjusūtranaya comprehends the state of the object at a particular moment only, but the sthūla rjusūtranaya looks at the state of the object as it is presented in the series of moments constituting the present.? Akalanka has given copious examples of rjusūtranaya. RJUSŪTRANAYABHASA (FALLACY OF RJUSŪTRANAYA) Rjusūtranaya gives primary importance to the modifications (paryāyas) considering the substance (dravya) secondary; but the rjusūtranayābhāsa (fallacy of rjusutranya) totally neglects the substance and considers the modifications the only redity. 8 The Buddhistic kşaņkavāda is a clear example of the fallacy of 1 Nayacakra. 2 Tattvārtha Rājavārtika, p. 96-97. 3 Pramāṇanayatattvāloka 7, 30. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590