Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

Previous | Next

Page 419
________________ 398 A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY. of three types (1) smarana (2) pratyabhijñā and tarka. Smarana is the cause of pratyabhijñi and pratyabhijñā is the caure of tarka. Hence these three are the instruments in the formation of anumāna. Therefore he has considered these as gauna. There is another reason mentioned in tíre Nyāyaviniscaya, in that work pratyakşa, anumāna and āgama have been mentioned as praināņas, and other pramāṇas have been included as form of anumāna. LB REFUTATION OF CĀRVĀKA VIEW The Cārvāka maintains that sense-percetion is the only valid sou. rce of knowledge, there is no other pramāņi. The criterion for determining the pramāna suggested by Cārvāka is avisaṁväda (non-contradiction with fact). And the other pramāṇas except the indriya pratya. ksa are based or do not possess these characteristics. Anumāna and other pramāņas are based on probability. And there would be distinctions and differentiations in the strength of probability on the basis of the time element and the element of form. In these cases, it would be difficult to find the characteristics of avinābhāva and avyabhicāra (unerring). For example, a sour and bitter fruit may be transformed into a sweet fruit through the passage of time and in a different place due to some material transformations also. Therefore, the inference regarding the fruit as bitter would not be adequate. Similarly, the case is with smarana and other pramānas. But this contention of the Carvāka is not satisfactory, because even to affirm the sweetness or otherwise of the fruit in the first instant would involve the process of inference and other forms of pramāņas. Similarly, to make a distinction between pratyākṣa pramāna and other forms of pramāņas as invalid source of knowledge on the basis of the criterion of avisaṁvāda (non-contradiction) would involve the process of inference. Similarly, it is not possibl: to know the mind of the others without the help of the inference. Because through the indriyas we cannot know the mind of others. We can know the mental states of others by inference on the basis of the behaviour and their sppech.: The inference is based on 1 Dharmakīrti, Pramāņamimārisā Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590