Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 406
________________ A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY 385 as given in the fästras. For instance, we can mention Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa as laukika āgamas while the ai gas like Acāranga, Sülrakrtāngā, Samavāyānga, Bhagavati, etc., coming from the omniscient tirthankara are lokottara agama. Lokottarāgama has been distinguished into three types as sutrāgama, atthāgama and tadubhayāgama.' Agamas have also been distinguished into three types from another point of view : ātmāgama, anantarāgama and paramparāgama.. Agama has also been distinguished into two forms as artharüpa and sütrarūpa. The tirthankara preaches the doctrines to his disciples, i.e. artharüpa agama. It is ātmägama for tirthaikara because it comes from the omniscient only and not received from any other person. Ginadharas receive the teaching of the tirthankara directly. There is no third person in between them. Therefore this arthāgama received by the ganadharas is anantarāgama for themselves. But on the basis of this arthāgama, ganadharas present it to the others in the forms of Sūtra (aphorisms), therefore this sūtrāgama for the ganadharas is ātmāgama. The disciples of the Ganadhara receive the teaching directly and there is no third person involved. Therefore, agama teaching received by the disciples from the Ganadharas direcly is called anatarāgama for the disciples. But from the point of view of the content of the teaching it is paramparāgama, because it comes from the master to the teacher in succession. In this sense, the teachings received by the ganadharas cannot also be considered as ātmāgama because it was received from the tirtharkara. For the disciples of the ganadharas and their disciples in succession sutragami and arthāgama are to be considered as parumparāgama only. :. So far, we have discussed the nature of pramānas. The validity of the pramāņıs have been discussed in the āgamas and on the basis of that discussion, the later ācāryas have developed a system of logic 1. Anuyogadvāra 49-50. p. 68-Punyavjayaji Ed. 2. Ibid, sūtra 470, p. 179. 3. Ibid. 4. Avašyaka niryukti, gāthā 92. 5. Anuyogadvāra sūtra 470, p. 170. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590