Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 358
________________ 337 through the operation of the sense-organs and through their limitation. But we also get knowledge without the media of the senseorgans. This knowledge need not be limited. Because the limitations of the sense-organs are not operative in the complete or uneneveloped knowledge. Through the complete knowledge all the objects can be cognised at a time moment. 1294 KNOWLEDGE AND THE OBJECT OF KNOWLEDGE The relation between the knowledge and the object of knowledge is like the object and its quality. The subject of knowledge is characterised by the possession of cognition. The object has a characteristic as the object of knowledge. Both these are independent. But both are intimately related in the sense that the object enters into relation with the cognition as the object of cognition and cognition has the relation of knowing the object. In this sense, we may say that there is no difference between the object and cognition. KNOWLEDGE AND INTUITION The psychic energy that the soul possesses is expressed in cognition, perception, and experience. The eyes perceive. The other experiences are possible through the other sense-organs including the manas. According to the agamas the experience through the eyes as well the experience through the other organs may be considered as darsana. Avadhi (clairvoyance) and kevala (omniscience) may also be considered as darśana. In this analysis darsana does not mean only perception. But it means the experience of the universe and the nondifference. Knowledge (jñäna) is analytic and it presents the varied characteristics of the object. Jñana is of five types, while darśana is of four types. Manaḥparyaya jñāna (telepathy) is not considered as drasana, because it cognises difference only. A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY Jain Education International 1 The universe has diversity when considered with reference to attributes, modes, but considered from the point of substance, it is one and undifferentiated. Therefore, we cannot say that the universe is one only or diverse only. The capacity of empirical knowledge is limited. Therefore, we first know the generality of the substance and then we cognise the diversity to be founded in the attributes and modes, For Private & Personal Use Only ܕܪ www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590