Book Title: Source Book in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Devendramuni
Publisher: Tarak Guru Jain Granthalay

Previous | Next

Page 398
________________ A SOURCE-BOOK IN JAINA PHILOSOPHY 377 karmas are destroyed simultaneously. When there is no succession of time in the destruction of jñānāvarniya and darśanāvarṇīya karmas there is no possibility of the successive presentation of the kevalajñāna and kevaladarśana. They have to be presented simultaneously. And also because there is no distinction in the upayoga, although upayoga expresses itself in the anākāra and sākāra forms. In the case of the kevalin state there is no distinction between darśana and jñāna. And to consider darśana and jñāna as distinct would raise some other difficulties. If the kevalin is to know everything at one moment of experience, then for all times he will be knowing everything. In that case, his knowiedge would not be perfect because he would go on knowing and experiencing. In that case, how can it be omniscient. But in the case of omniscience, knowledge and experience are perfect and one. And there would we no distinction between jñāna and darsana. Jñāna is determinate (savikalpa) and darśana is indeterminate (nirvikalpa). This kind of distinction between the determinate and indeterminate cognition is not be found when the kārmic matter obscuring knowledge and intuition are destroyed.2 As long as there is perfect, not but imperfect expression of upayoga there would be distinction between determinate and indeterminate cognition. But when upayoga is perfectly and fully expressed, there would be no distinction of this type. One more difficulty would be that darśana (intuition) would be without the element of jñāna. But in the case of jñāna, the element of darśana is involved.3 In the case of the kevalin when be gets omniscient knowledge, then darśana again would not be possible because darśana is not involved with jñāna although jñāna involves darśana. Therefore, the successive cognition of darśana and jñāna in the case of the perfect knowledge would not be possible. The Digambara tradition accepts the simultaneous cognition of darśana and jñāna. But in the Svetāmbara tradition there are three streams of thought : (a) successive cognition of the two, (b) simultaneous cognition and (c) non-difference of darśana and 1 2 3 Sanmati prakarana 2, 10 Sanmati prakarana 2, 11. Ibid. 2; 22. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590