Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 51
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 79
________________ APRIL, 1922] THE HISTORY OF THE NIZAM SHAHI KINGS OF AHMADNAGAR defeat was entirely due to Bihzâd-ul-Mulk's having been appointed commander-in-chief, or although it could not be denied that of bravery, generosity, personal beauty and good nature Bihzâd-ul-Mulk had a large share, he was utterly inexperienced in war, and the amirs, knowing that Sayyid Murtaza was available for the command, paid a very unwilling obedience to such a youth. 71 Bihzâd-ul-Mulk was now encamped at the village of Dhârâseo, between Naldrug and Sholapur, engaged in nothing but enjoyment and self indulgence when, at about the breakfast hour, his camp was suddenly rushed by the army of Bijapûr with such suddenness that the troops had not time to arm themselves, and could make no attempt at resistance.240 The greater part of the royal army fled, and although Malik Bihaâd-ul-Mulk, with a small force, most gallantly charged the enemy's centre yet, as most of the army had fled, this effort was of little avail, and Bihzâd-ul-Mulk, shedding tears of regret, was at length forced to flee from the field. All the baggage, property, horses, elephants, 241 tents, and camp equipage of Bihzâd-ul-Mulk and his army, fell into the hands of the 'Adil Shahi troops, and thus a strong and well appointed army was scattered in a moment, like a girl's locks by the morning breeze, and wandered over plains and deserts. The Adil Shahi army thus attained both its objects, and gained large quantities of spoil. The Bijapûrîs in their pride then marched towards Bidar for the purpose of aidin! Barid-ul-Mulk. When the news of this disgraceful defeat was brought to ṣalâbat Khân, he bitterly regretted having appointed Bihzâd-ul-Mulk who had proved himself to be utterly without foresight and prudence, commander-in-chief. It was all owing to Salabat Khân's enmity against Sayyid Murtaga, that this defeat befell the royal army. When Bihzâd-ul-Mulk's broken army reached the army of Sayyid Murtaza, he mount ed his horse and rode to some rising ground to one side of his camp and ordered his whole army to arm themselves and to come forth from their camp, and he secretly sent one of his confidential servants to his own tent with orders to remove everything of value, pack it up, and send it to Ahmadnagar and to burn everything else that could not be carried away. It was at nightfall that news of the defeat was brought to Sayyid Murtaşâ, and darkness had fallen by the time that his army came forth from its camp and the sauve qui peut began. Sayyid Murtaza also was compelled to take flight and the whole army fled through the night, resting nowhere till daybreak, so that the hardships endured by the army of Sayyid Murtazâ in their nocturnal flight were not less than those endured by the camp of Bihzad-ul-Mulk in their defeat by day. The next day, when the Nigâm Shahi army were halted on the bank of a river, spies brought word that the 'Adil Shahi army, after ita victory, had marched at once in the direction of Bidar, 142 without attempting to pursue the fugitives, and Sayyid Murtaza, ashamed of his unreasonable panic and flight, at once set to work to remedy the state of affairs. At 240 Firishta gives two different accounts of his affair. In his chronicles of Bijapur he makes it appear that the army of Bijapur attacked that of Ahmadnagar in daylight, and that the latter was well prepared, but was defeated after a pitched battle. In his chronicles of Ahmadnagar he says that the army of Bijapur fell on that of Ahmadnagar before dawn, when Biheid-ul-Mulk was engaged in a drinking bout, and took it completely by surprise, so that it was able to make no stand.-F. ii. 94, 289. 241 About 150, or, according to another account, about 100 elephants were captured.-F. ii. 95, 280. 243 This passage refers to the siege of Bidar (see above) which is not mentioned by Firishta. It may well be doubted whether Murtaza Nizam Shah, or rather Salabat hin, was attempting simultaneously the annexation of Bijapur and Bidar.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374