Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 51
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 142
________________ 134 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [ JULY, 1922 which they had in the later inscriptions as the values attached to the cuneiform signs by the Assyro-Babylonians are different from those which they had in the Sumerian script. Like the Caucasus to-day, Asia Minor in those early times was the honte and meeting-place of a very large number of unrelated languages. In the tablets of Boghaz Keui Dr. Forrer finds no less than eight different languages represented, to which I have been able to add a ninth. One of these languages is what he calls Proto-Hittite, which was the real language of the country and is as unlike the official "language of the scribes" as Chinese is unlike Latin. There was, in fact, no relationship between them except in the matter of borrowed words, and it therefore becomes a question whether the official language, which we have hitherto termed Hittite, has any real right to the name. Since it was used, however, at Boghaz Keui, which bore the name of Kattusas "the Hittite" or "Silver lily," the word khattu signifying "silver," I think we are justified in retaining the old term and distinguishing the earlier language of the country as Proto-Hittite. Another language which has been brought to light is that of the Kharri or Murri-the pronunciation of the name is still doubtful-who were emigrants from Mitanni or Northern Mesopotamia. One of the texts in the Kharrian language is a long epic in no less than fourteen tablets, by a certain poet Kesse, about the Babylonian hero Gilgames. The people of Mitanni -that is, "the land of Midas," afterwards famous in Phrygian legend-originally came from the Caucasus and preceded the Semitic Assyrians in the possession of Assur. The earliest High-Priests of Assur known to us bear Mitannian names, and the attributes assigned by the Assyrians to their god Assur were many of them of Mitannian origin, while the chief goddess of Assyria continued to be invoked by her Mitannian name of Sala, "the Lady." The Mitannian Kharri were at one time employed as mercenaries by the Hittite Kings, but their place was afterwards supplied by the Khabiri, whose name is translated "Execu tioners." The Khabiri, once erroneously identified with the Hebrews of the Old Testament, formed the chief part of the royal body-guard; 600 of them, we are told, protected one part of the city and 600 the other part of it. I believe I have evidence showing that they were the original of the Greek Kabeiri, who consequently had nothing to do with the Phoenicians or a Phoenician word. The Khabiri were an old institution in Babylonia; Rim-Agum, the Arioch of Genesis and contemporary of Khammurabi, mentions them as among the mercenary troops who formed his body-guard. The Khabiri of the Tel-cl-Amarna tablets were the picked soldiers of the Hittite King. The Hittite King was deified. His supreme title was "the Sun-god," not "the son of the Sun-god" as in Egypt, and he was regarded as the manifestation of the Sun-god here on earth. The belief survived into the later religions of Asia Minor; at Pessinus, for instance, as Sir W. M. Ramsay has shown, the High Priest of Athys was himself Athys and was accordingly addressed under that name. Whether religious worship was paid to the deified king during his lifetime we do not yet know: it was at any rate paid to him after his death in many cases. Most of the older Hittite Kings who reigned before the foundation of the Empire and when Boghaz Keui had not as yet become the capital, were included among the gods; one of the most popular gods indeed was Telibinus who reigned 2000 B.C., and a special cult was paid to Khasa-milis "the Swordsman," another king of the same period, in whom I see the Kabirite Kasmilos of Greek mythology. Eastern Asia Minor had been at an early date the object of attack on the part of the Babylonian Kings, who were attracted to it by its metal-mines. Already, in the time of the 3rd dynasty of Ur, that is to say, B.C. 2400, a flourishing Babylonian colony was established

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374