Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 11
Author(s): E Hultzsch
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 288
________________ DATES OF PANDYA KINGS. No. 24]. This date is altogether unsatisfactory. In the 7th year of the reign of Jaṭavarman Sundara-Pandya I the 10th sukla tithi in Mina corresponded to Saturday, March 10th A.D. 1258, the Pushya nakshatra being current at mean sunrise. For the 7th year of the reign of Jața varman Sundara-Pandya II I have tried all the possible years. In no case is the nakshatra quoted correct for the day corresponding to the 10th sukla tithi in Mina, these being always either Punarvasu, Pushya, or Aslesha, and never Hasta. Only in one year, A.D. 1284, does the 10th sakla tithi correspond to a Sunday, and that was on 27th February of that year; but the nakshatra for that day was Punarvasu. The record cannot belong to the reign of any possible king of the name coming between Maravarman Kulasekhara I, whose last known date is June 9th A.D. 1309, and the second king of that name, whose reign began in March A.D. 1314; since in all the possible years that I have tried, the nakshatra, on the given day, is either Punarvasu or Pushya. Indeed during the month of Mina the moon cannot be in Hasta on a 10th sukla tithi. 255 100. In the Vighnesvara temple at Tirukkachchür.1 1 Svasti śri [*] Kor-Chadapanmar-ana Tiribhuva Jnachobakkaravattigal emmandala]mun-gond-aruliya sri-Sundara Pandiyadevarkku yaṇḍu tradiyaiya[m] Viyala-kkila]maiyum perra Risha 2 bha-nayarṛu pürrva-pakahattu Pūśattu nā[!]. "In the 8th year (of the reign) of king Jaṭavarman alias the emperor of the three worlds, the glorious Sundara-Paṇḍyadeva, who was pleased to take every country,- on the day of Pushya which corresponded to a Thursday and to the third tithi of the first fortnight of the month of Rishabha." 101.-In the Neḍungalanathasvamin temple at Tiruneḍungalam.5 8vadu3 This date is irregular. To correspond with the 8th year of the named king, either the first or the second of the dynasty, the day must fall in either A.D. 1258, 1283, or 1284. In 1258 the 3rd sukla tithi in Vrishabha was current at sunrise of a Tuesday, and the nakshatra was Mrigasiras or Ardra at sunrise. In 1283 the week-day was Saturday, and the nakshatra was Mrigasiras by all systems. In 1284 the week-day was Friday, and the nakshatra at sunrise was Punarvasu by all systems. Part of the 3rd śukla tithi, in this last case, coincided with Thursday; it did so in fact for the last 10 hours of that day; but during that period the nakshatra was Ardra or Punarvasu. 1 [v][0][1]samasta-jagad-ädhärn 5 [Sun]da[ra]-Pa[ndiya] do[va]rku yanḍu pa[i]to [n]ravadu? Makara-nayarru pa[rvva]pakahatta [sha]sh[th]iy[u]m Budhan-kila[m]aiyum 6 perra Urosan [i]-nal. 1 No. 319 of the Madras Epigraphical collection for 1909. 2 Read Tribhuvana.. 3 radu is represented by a flourish. No. 677 of the Madras Epigraphical collection for 1909. The portion of this line, from ndiya to vadu, is written over an erasure. Read padinonrüvadu. [Sun]dara-Pandyadeva, • "In the eleventh year (of the reign) of -on the day of Rohini which corresponded to a Wednesday and to the sixth tithi of the first fortnight of the month of Makara." Read tritiyaiyum.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438