________________
260
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA.
[Vol. XI.
agrees with Nos. 23 and 24 as regards the day of the king's accession. Accepting this alteration I think that instead of altering the regnal years given in Nos. 23 and 24, it was those given in Nos. 25 and 27 that required correction. It is only fair to remember that apparently Professor Kielhorn had, at the time that he wrote, very few inscriptions of this king before him.
With these preliminary remarks I proceed to summarize the results for all the records yet examined, from which it will be seen that there is now a strong presumption in favour of the socession-date put forward by me. In the list, "K" stands for Kielhorn, and "S" for Sewell, The inscription dates are published above, in Vols. VI, pp. 310-12, VIII, pp. 278-280, and x, pp. 127-28 as well as in the present article.
No.
Date of inscription A. D.
Regnal year.
Accession later than A. D.
Notes.
Year 6 should be yeur 5. ." 13th tithi" should be
"3rd." Year 15 should be year 14.
Year 10 should be year 9. . Year 11 should be year 12.
"Kayā" should be "Simha."
23 Mon. 1 Aag. 1289 13 1 Aug. 1276. Fri. 5 Aug. 1289
5 Aug. 1276. Mon. 21 July 1281 21 July 1275 Fri. 12 Sept. 1287
12 Sept. 1275 Mon. 15 May 1290 15 15 May 1275 Mon. 23 July 1235 23 July 1275 Wed. 29 Oct. 1287 29 Oct. 1276. Wed. 27 Aug. 1287 . 12 27 Aug. 1275. Mon. 28 Aug. 1290 . 15 28 Aug. 1275. (Doubtful). Mon. 30 Sept. 1286 . 10 30 Sept. 1276. Mon. 20 Feb. 1290.15(P) 20 Feb. 1275 . Wed. 18 Mar. 1293. 17 18 Mar. 1276. Sat. 14 Mar. 1293 . 17 14 Mar. 1276. (Irregulur).
(Irrogular). 99. (Irregular).
(Irregular). (Irregular). (Irregular). (Reign of J. San. P.1.)
Year 10 should be year 11. Year 15 should be year 14.
