________________
3TTHET4-8• 100
by the senses of sight and the like’.18 Hence, the identity of a past object and a present datum cannot lie within the jurisdiction of sensory perception. Therefore, we are justified to cunclude that the province of recognition is different from that of recollection and perception. No doubt, recognition is a synthetic judgement born of perception and recollection, but it cannot be regarded as the mere combination of the two, inasmuch as it is a new state of the mind as a unitary cognition.
Foot-notes 1.Nandi-sūtra, 35. 2.Dhāraṇā pratipattiryathāsvam matyavasthānamavadhāranaṁ ca. Tattvārtha
bhāsya, I, 15. 3....... aviccui dhāraņā tassa. Višeșāvaśyaka-bhāsya, 180. 4.Ibid, 291. 5.Avetasya kālāntare avismaranakaranam dhāraņā. Sarvārthasiddhi, I, 15. 6.Nirjñātārthāvismrtirdhāraņā. Tattvārtha-rāja-vārttika, I, 15, 4. 7...... smrtihetuḥ sā dhāraņā. Tattvārtha-śloka-vārttika, I, 15, 4. 8.Sa eva drdhatamāvasthāpanno dhāraṇā. Pramāņa-naya-tattvāloka, II, 10. 9.Syadvāda-ratnākara, II, 10. 10.Ibid. 11.Smrtiheturdhāraṇā. Pramāņa-mimāṁsā, I, I, 29. 12.Commentary on Pramāņa-mimāṁsā, I, I, 29. 13.Vāsanodbodhahetukā tadityākārā smrtiḥ, Pramāņa-mimāṁsā, 1, 2, 3. 14. Āvaraṇakşayopaśamasadṛśadarśanādisāmagrilabdhaprabodhā tu smộtim
janayati, Commentary on Pramāņa-mimāṁsā, I, 2, 3. 15.Pramāņa-mimāṁsă, I, 2, 4. 16.Purvāparākāraikadhuriņam hi dravyaṁ pratyabhijñānasya visayaḥ.
Commentary of Pramāņa-mimāṁsā, I, 2, 4. 17.Pūrvapramitamātre hi jāyate sa iti smrtiḥ. Sa evāyamitiyam tu
pratyabhijñātirekiņi. Tattva-sangraha, 453. 18.Sambaddham vartamānam ca grhyate cakşurādinā. Ślokavārttika, IV,
84.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
